His Majesty’s Advocate v Jean Hay, Widow of John Cuthbert: HL 26 Apr 1758

Adjudication and Infeftment – Prescription – Interruption.-
A bond was granted by a party to his creditor, upon which adjudication, charter, and infeftment followed, this adjudication comprising several other separate debts; the bond debt lay over for 66 years, when the present claim was made, and the negative prescription pleaded against the adjudication: Held that a claim made before the Government Commissioners of Enquiry on forfeited estates and registration thereof, together with a submission, followed by decree-arbitral, entered into by the debtor with one of the creditors in the separate debts comprised in this adjudication, and assignation of that debt by him to the debtor within the 40 years, were sufficient to interrupt the negative prescription in regard to the debt, it being one of those comprised in the adjudication thus acknowledged by the debtor.

Citations:

[1758] UKHL 2 – Paton – 272

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Scotland

Land

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.558248