EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Review
The Employment Tribunal had erred by considering the application for review only in terms of new evidence pursuant to rule 34(3)(d). Although the refusal of the application for review could not have succeeded on that basis, the interests of justice were also engaged and the Employment Tribunal should have considered the point being made by the Appellant that there was now evidence that the email in question must have been manipulated. The Employment Appeal Tribunal had all the material needed and rather than remit the matter ordered there to be a review.
Judges:
Hand QC J
Citations:
[2011] UKEAT 0424 – 10 – 1905
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.441161