Herbert v Pegrum and Another: CA 31 Jan 2005

The judge at first instance had been wrong to rely on a 1931 document as establishing an estoppel in favour of the claimant; there was in fact no clear and unambiguous wording in the claimant’s favour on which he could claim to have detrimentally relied.

Judges:

Latham, Neuberger LJJ

Citations:

[2005] EWCA Civ 120

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Land

Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222860