DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
The appeal raised the issues of whether the tribunal decision had properly considered the detriments relied on by the claimant before the tribunal and in particular whether the tribunal had given sufficient reasons for its findings that there was no victimisation. The EAT thought that although poorly structured, the tribunal had considered all the detriments put forward, albeit in a compendious form and decided that in each case no detriment was made out because the claimant had an unjustified sense of grievance. The second point taken was that the tribunal had considered the question of detriment purely from the point of view of the employer but this was not borne out.
Judges:
John Bowers QC, Deputy Judge of the High Court
Citations:
[2021] UKEAT 2020-000013
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 06 June 2022; Ref: scu.677778