The court was asked whether a charging order placed on the Claimant’s property in Surrey should be discharged. The real issue is whether or not the debt, which related to a costs order made against the Claimant, has been or is to be considered as having been discharged.
Judges:
Akenhead J
Citations:
[2013] EWHC 721 (TCC)
Links:
Citing:
See Also – Heifer International Inc v Christiansen TCC 18-Dec-2007
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Construction
Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.472253