EAT Leave to amend claim to include certain unfair dismissal complaints rejected by Tribunal Chairman. Attempt made before another Chairman to contend that the amendment should be permitted because it merely gave a label to what had already been identified in the body of the claim. This was a fresh argument. Ought the second Chairman to have reconsidered the original Chairman’s decision? Observation made on the distinction between review and reconsideration of Tribunal case management rulings and the circumstances where reconsideration is permissible.
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Elias (President)
Citations:
UKEAT/0074/06, [2006] UKEAT 0055 – 06 – 2302, UKEAT/0055/06, [2006] ICR 655
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Sodexho Ltd v Gibbons EAT 14-Jul-2005
EAT Deposit ordered. Order lost in post due to the Claimant putting wrong post-code on ET1. Review. Distinguishing Judgments from Orders. Strike-out. Extending time. . .
Cited by:
Cited – Tradition Securities and Futures Sa and Another v Times Newspapers Ltd and others EAT 10-Nov-2008
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Restricted reporting order
Restricted Reporting Order relating to allegations of sexual misconduct – Whether Tribunal entitled to vary order in order to permit naming of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238795