EAT Practice and Procedure – Preliminary issues
The Employment Tribunal was wrong to conclude that an ET1 could constitute a written grievance for the purpose of satisfying section 32 of the Employment Act 2002.
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Wilkie
Citations:
[2007] UKEAT 0023 – 07 – 2702, UKEAT/0023/07/RN
Links:
Statutes:
Employment Act 2002 32, Employment Act 2002 (Disputes Procedures) Regulations 2004
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Shergold v Fieldway Medical Centre EAT 5-Dec-2005
The claimant had submitted a grievance complaining in general terms of the way in which she had been treated by a manager. She did not, however, refer to a particular incident relied on in her pleading as one of the two ‘last straw’ incidents that . .
Cited by:
Cited – Step In Time Ltd v Fox and Another EAT 3-Nov-2008
EAT STATUTORY DISCIPLINE AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
Whether infringed
The employment judge held that the two claimants had complied with the statutory grievance procedures and that the Tribunal had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 10 July 2022; Ref: scu.249948