(Grand Chamber) – Press Release
[2009] ECHR 480, 22978/05, (2009) 48 EHRR 13
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 6(3)
Human Rights
Citing:
See Also – Gafgen v Germany ECHR 30-Jun-2008
(Fifth Section) The claimant said that having been arrested by police, their treatment of him amounted to torture.
Held: Iit was not necessary to rule on the Government’s preliminary objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. It held, . .
Cited by:
See Also – Gafgen v Germany ECHR 1-Jun-2010
(Grand Chamber) The claimant said that police treatment during his interview had amounted to torture.
Held: The Salduz principles were not restricted to the failure to provide access to a lawyer during interview. There is no clear consensus . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 August 2021; Ref: scu.445164