(Practice and Procedure) The employment tribunal failed properly to consider the open justice principle, including the importance of naming names, in ordering the anonymisation of all clients of the first respondent and failed to apply the necessary step by step consideration of the application for redaction of documents described in the order as being ‘commercially sensitive’ and ‘irrelevant’. The matter was remitted to the employment tribunal.
Judges:
His Honour Judge James Tayler
Citations:
[2022] EAT 34
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 27 April 2022; Ref: scu.675610