The court considered the outcome of mutual cross claims, which substantially failed, of harrassment in the use of extra-court debt recovery methods, and the pitfalls of: ‘(a) engaging in debt recovery, other than through conventional means; (b) seeking without notice injunctions, without making full and proper disclosure of all relevant material; (c) being too ready to bring civil claims for harassment, when the conduct complained of does not, on proper analysis, fall within the definition of harassment; and (d) pursuing complicated civil claims without the benefit of full and proper legal analysis or advice. ‘
Stephen Davis HHJ
[2014] EWHC 2747 (QB)
Bailii
England and Wales
Torts – Other
Updated: 20 December 2021; Ref: scu.536030