Folien Fischer Ag and Another v Ritrama Spa: ECJ 19 Apr 2012

ECJ (Opinion) Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters – Interpretation of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Special grounds of jurisdiction – Matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Meaning – Action for a negative declaration (negative Feststellungsklage) – Right of a potential injuring party to sue the party potentially injured in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur in order to obtain a declaration as to the non-existence of liability in tort.

Judges:

Askinen AG

Citations:

C-133/11, [2012] EUECJ C-133/11, [2013] ILPr 1, [2013] QB 523, [2014] 1 All ER (Comm) 569, [2013] 2 WLR 373, ECLI:EU:C:2012:664, [2012] WLR(D) 292, [2013] CEC 727

Links:

Bailii, WLRD

Statutes:

Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 5(3)

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

OpinionFolien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA ECJ 25-Oct-2012
ECJ Area of freedom, security and justice – Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters – Special jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict – Action for a negative declaration (‘negative Feststellungsklage’) . .
CitedAMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier and Others SC 1-Mar-2017
AMT entered into many financial services agreements providing for exclusive EW jurisdiction. It now sought to restrain the defendant German lawyers from encouraging litigation in Germany saying that induced breaches of the contracts. It also sought . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Jurisdiction

Updated: 03 February 2022; Ref: scu.460413