The applicant had had rejected her challenge to the planning policy of the respondens. The court now considered the Council’s motion for expenses.
Judges:
Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Hodge, Lord McEwan
Citations:
[2011] ScotCS CSIH – 77, [2011] CSIH 77
Links:
Statutes:
Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997
Citing:
See Also – Uprichard v Order of The Scottish Ministers SCS 30-Jul-2010
The petitioners soiught to object to the decision of the Ministers to approve a structure plan proposed for the future development of St Andrews.
Held: The request was refused. . .
Principal judgment – Uprichard v The Scottish Ministers and Another SCS 7-Sep-2011
The applicant sought a reclaiming motion against the local council’s Structure plan.
Held: The request was refused. Lord Justice Clerk Gill said: ‘A structure plan is that part of the statutory development plan that sets out the overall . .
Cited by:
See Also – Uprichard v Scottish Ministers and Another (Scotland) SC 24-Apr-2013
The appellants challenged the adequacy of the reasons given by the respondents in approving planning policies, in particular the structure plan, adopted by Fife Council for the future development of St Andrews. An independent expert’s report had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Scotland, Planning, Costs
Updated: 29 September 2022; Ref: scu.449773