The 1990 Regulation, SI 1990 No 2854, should be construed in the light of the European Directive. The Institute was exempt from Value Added Tax. Its aims of promoting and supporting the proper administration of justice, and the early resolution of disputes, were sufficiently in the public interest, and so closely connected to the administration of justice to bring it within the section as amended by the regulation. The Directive did not require that the body should be altruistic, and it was not relevant that the decision might lead to other bodies also becoming exempt.
Citations:
Times 12-Apr-2001
Statutes:
Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of laws relating to turnover taxes, Value Added Tax Act 1994 Sch 9 Group 9 para (e), Value Added Tax (Education) (No 2) Order 1994 (1994 No 2969)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appealed to – Expert Witness Institute v Commissioners of Customs and Excise CA 12-Dec-2001
A not for profit institute whose stated aims were ‘supporting the proper administration of justice and the early resolution of disputes’ came within the terms of the Directive and was exempt from VAT. Article 13A(1)(l) provided for exemption for the . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Expert Witness Institute v Commissioners of Customs and Excise CA 12-Dec-2001
A not for profit institute whose stated aims were ‘supporting the proper administration of justice and the early resolution of disputes’ came within the terms of the Directive and was exempt from VAT. Article 13A(1)(l) provided for exemption for the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
VAT, European
Updated: 06 August 2022; Ref: scu.80423