M. had recovered against E. by default in the Kings Bench, 43 Eliz. and error was assign’d, because there was not any bayl put that term, and then there was not any appearance, and that being so certified, the judgment was resettle reversed.
Citations:
[1669] EngR 190, (1669) Noy 45, (1669) 74 ER 1014 (C)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Litigation Practice
Updated: 18 May 2022; Ref: scu.407030