Edwards v Environment Agency: ECJ 18 Oct 2012

ECJ (Opinion) Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/35/EC – Directive 85/337/EEC – Assessment of the effects of projects on the environment – Directive 96/61/EC – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Access to justice – Concept of ‘prohibitively expensive’ judicial proceedings

Judges:

Kokott AG

Citations:

C-260/11, [2012] EUECJ C-260/11

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 85/337/EEC, Directive 2003/35/EC, Directive 96/61/EC

Cited by:

Opinion – Edwards v Environment Agency (No 2) ECJ 11-Apr-2013
ECJ Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 85/337/EEC – Directive 2003/35/EC – Article 10a – Directive 96/61/EC – Article 15a – Access to justice in environmental matters – Meaning of ‘not prohibitively . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Environment

Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.465393