The claimant challenged a decision that the council could properly refuse to re-instate him after a wrongful dismissal.
Citations:
[1996] EWCA Civ 502
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – D’Souza v Lambeth Borough Council EAT 18-Oct-1995
The employment tribunal held that it had not been practicable for the council to reinstate Mr D’Souza. He had succeeded in a claim for unfair dismissal and sought reinstatement, but this had been refused.
Held: An award of damages was made for . .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 6-Dec-1994
. .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 1-May-1995
. .
Cited by:
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 2-Jul-1997
. .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 9-Oct-1997
. .
See Also – D’Souza v Lambeth Borough Council CA 10-Dec-1997
. .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 14-Jan-1998
A re-instatement award after a finding of racial discrimination is in two stage process. The first part consisting of the order for re-instatement stays the balance of the award provisionally until the order for re-instatement has been complied with . .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 1-Jul-1998
. .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth and Another EAT 22-Jul-1998
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination
Updated: 27 October 2022; Ref: scu.140369