This was a dispute between contractors. D had been engaged to install balconies on flats constructed by O. Targets were set, but there were difficulties in obtaining supplies. Continued negotiations confused the situation. Eventually the contract was not completed. D sued for payment and O for damages.
Held: The initial documentation did not create a contract, but what was then created was later varied.
Judges:
Judge Richard Seymour Q.C.
Citations:
[2001] EWHC Technology 450
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Discain Project Services Limited v Opecprime Developments Limited TCC 11-Dec-2001
. .
See Also – Discain Project Services Ltd v Opecrime Development Ltd TCC 1-Aug-2000
The applicant sought leave to defend the enforcement of an arbitration award.
Held: The adjudicator had accepted oral and written communications with one party, from which the other party was excluded. This was such a serious breach of the . .
See Also – Discain Project Services Ltd v Opecrime Development Ltd TCC 11-Apr-2001
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Construction, Contract
Updated: 10 July 2022; Ref: scu.167237