The claimant had sought orders alleging a nuisance caused by his neighbour’s fir tree. He appealed a refusal of his claim which had been based upon the absence of any evidence to support it. Because of the long history of complaints between the parties, the court had also made a Grepe -v- Loam Order against the appellant.
Held: The appellant had failed to state sufficiently particularly his complaints against the order. The Grepe v Loam order acted as a filter and not as a bar. Appeal refused.
Citations:
[1999] EWCA Civ 1925
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Grepe v Loam; Bulteel v Grepe CA 1887
The court was asked for an order restricting the right of a group of litigants be restrained from beginning further court actions without first obtaining the court’s consent, they having been accused of issuing vexatious proceedings.
Held: The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Nuisance, Litigation Practice
Updated: 31 May 2022; Ref: scu.146840