The appellant had been dismissed for redundancy. She sought to appeal saying that there had been no redundancy. The tribunal had refused to award damages for the period after she had found alternative employment.
Held: The obtaining of permanent employment at the same or a greater salary will not in all cases break the chain of causation.
Judges:
Beldam, Mummery LJJ, Sir Christopher Staughton
Citations:
[1998] EWCA Civ 934, [1998] IRLR 653
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Dench v Fynn and Partners (A Firm) EAT 26-Feb-1997
Preliminary hearing to see if there is an arguable issue of law arising out of the Tribunal decision. . .
See Also – Dench ex parte v Fynn and Partners (a Firm) CA 25-Jun-1997
Application for leave to appeal – granted. . .
See Also – Dench v Fynn and Partners EAT 30-Oct-1997
. .
Cited by:
See Also – Dench v Fynn and Partners EAT 24-Sep-1999
. .
Cited – Afolayan v MRCS Ltd EAT 23-Aug-2011
EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL
Where an Employment Tribunal has been directed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal and by a Regional Employment Judge, to consider an application for costs of a hearing before a . .
Cited – Commercial Motors (Wales) Ltd v Howley EAT 6-Aug-2012
commercial_howleyEAT2012
EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Compensation
In a hearing on remedies for unfair dismissal, the Employment Tribunal held that the Respondent employer had to pay compensation for, inter alia, the losses suffered by . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Damages
Updated: 30 May 2022; Ref: scu.144413