Davidsson v Hill: CA 1901

Ships collided at sea. The negligent crew were aboard the British ship. A crew member on the Norwegian ship died in the collision, and his family sued here.
Held: The family had a right of action against the defendant owners of the British ship. The existence of a cause of action in favour of dependants of a person negligently killed was regarded as a universal principle which should be treated as part of the international law maritime.

Judges:

Kennedy and Phillimore LJJ

Citations:

[1901] 2 KB 606, (1901) 70 LJKB 788, (1901) 85 LT 118, (1901) 49 WR 630, (1901) 9 Asp MLC 223

Statutes:

Fatal Accidents Act 1846, Fatal Accidents Act 1864

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedCox v Ergo Versicherung Ag CA 25-Jun-2012
The deceased member of the armed forces had died in a road traffic accident in Germany. The parties didputed whether the principles governing the calculation of damages were those in the 1976 Act and UK law, or under German law.
Held: ‘There . .
AppliedThe Esso Malaysia 1974
A Russian seaman died as the result of a collision in international waters between two foreign registered vessels. His family sought to claim here.
Held: The benefit of the Fatal Accidents Acts can, in principle, be claimed by a foreigner. The . .
CitedCox v Ergo Versicherung Ag SC 2-Apr-2014
The deceased army officer serving in Germany died while cycling when hit by a driver insured under German law. His widow, the claimant, being domiciled in England brought her action here, claiming for bereavement and loss of dependency. The Court . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

International, Torts – Other

Updated: 21 August 2022; Ref: scu.460862