In the context of patents, Arnold J accepted that ‘extent of protection’ was purely a question of the scope of the claims under Article 69(1) of the EPC, and that was a different concept to ‘the rights conferred’ under national UK law.
Judges:
Arnold J
Citations:
[2012] Bus LR 160, [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat), [2011] RPC 17
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd and Another v Apple Inc ChD 4-Apr-2012
The parties were engaged in worldwide litigation disputing an alleged infringement of Apple’s registered design by Samsung’s Galaxy tablet computer. In this case, Samsung sought a declaration of non-infringement. Apple counterclaimed, alleging . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 19 November 2022; Ref: scu.428704