The beneficiary of a charging order had standing to intervene in proceedings leading to the forfeiture of a lease even several years after the lease had been forfeit. It was an interest derived from the lessee’s interest and a proper basis. The creditors not being told of the forfeiture in this case should not lose their charge of substantial value for tiny arrears.
Citations:
Gazette 02-Sep-1999, Times 24-Aug-1999, [1999] EWCA Civ 2010, [2001] Ch 318
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Yorkshire Bank Finance Ltd v Mulhall and Another CA 24-Oct-2008
The bank had obtained a judgement against the defendant, and took a charging order. Nothing happened for more than twelve years, and the defendant now argued that the order and debt was discharged.
Held: The enforcement of the charging order . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant
Updated: 31 May 2022; Ref: scu.146925