Coppin v Bruce Smith: 1998

The landlord resisted the renewal of the lease of a tennis club, saying that he intended to redevelop the site.
Held: Planning permission had already been refused once, because of the loss of recreational facilities which would result. The landlord had an insufficiently realistic prospect of being able to redevelop the site.

Citations:

[1998] EGCS 55

Statutes:

Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 13 May 2022; Ref: scu.216661