Cooke v Oxley: 14 May 1790

A. having proposed to sell goods to B., gave him a, certain time at his request to determine whether he would buy them or not; B. within the time determined to buy them, and gave notice thereof to A. ; yet A. was not liable in an action for not delivering them, for B. not being bound by the original contract, there was no consideration to bind A.

Citations:

[1790] EngR 2367, (1790) 3 TR 653, (1790) 100 ER 785 (B)

Links:

Commonlii

Cited by:

ExplainedByrne v van Tienhoven and Co 1880
The defendant offered by a letter to the plaintiffs to sell them goods at a certain price. They later wrote to the plaintiffs to withdraw the offer. Before they knew of the revocation, the plaintiffs accepted the offer by telegram. The defendants . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.365420