The court found the defendant’s patent invalid for obviousness.
The Honourable Mr Justice Pumfrey
[2006] EWHC 260 (Pat), [2006] RPC 28
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Angiotech Pharmaceuticals and Another v Conor Medsystems Inc CA 16-Jan-2007
The appellants challenged a finding that their patent for a vascular stent failed for obviousness.
Held: To overcome a judge’s finding in such a case some error of principle had to be shown. No such error was shown and the appeal failed. . .
At Patents Court – Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc and others HL 9-Jul-2008
The respondents had applied for and obtained an order to revoke the appellant’s patent of a stent for obvousness. Though the parties had settled, the public law element required the intervention of the Comptroller General. The House was asked about . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 03 July 2021; Ref: scu.239304