Clarke v Coutts and Co (A Firm): CA 17 Jun 2002

The court refused to allow a very late amendment raising a new point.

Citations:

[2002] EWCA Civ 928

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See Also – Clarke v Coutts and Co CA 17-Jun-2002
The respondent bank had obtained a charging order nisi against the applicant’s property. The applicant then obtained an order under s252 of the act requiring any further action against his estate to be stayed. The bank nevertheless obtained an order . .

Cited by:

See Also – Clarke v Coutts and Co CA 17-Jun-2002
The respondent bank had obtained a charging order nisi against the applicant’s property. The applicant then obtained an order under s252 of the act requiring any further action against his estate to be stayed. The bank nevertheless obtained an order . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.217280