Practice and Procedure – Bias, Misconduct and Procedural Irregularity – Disposal of Appeal including remission
The Appellant argued that the ET had failed to comply with an Order by which the EAT remitted the case to the ET for it to consider the issues set out in that Order. The EAT held that the ET had erred in law by misinterpreting the EAT’s Decision remitting the case, and by embarking on its own inquiry, rather than by considering the issues which the EAT had required it to consider. The EAT remitted the case to a different ET for it to consider the issues originally remitted to the ET by the EAT.
Citations:
[2018] UKEAT 0105 – 17 – 2002
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 13 April 2022; Ref: scu.609157