Chase And Others, Assignees of William And Thomas Hurst (Bankrupts), v James And David Westmore: 21 May 1816

A workman having bestowed his labour upon a chattel in consideration of a price fixed in amount by his agreement with the owner, may detain the chattel until the price be paid; and this, though the chattel be delivered to the workman in different parcels, and at different times, if the work to be done under the agreement be entire. Semble, that where the parties contract for a particular time or mode of payment, the workman has not a right to set up a claim to the possession inconsistent with the terms of the contract.

Citations:

[1816] EngR 501, (1816) 5 M and S 180, (1816) 105 ER 1016

Links:

Commonlii

Cited by:

CitedYour Response Ltd v Datateam Business Media Ltd CA 14-Mar-2014
The claimant employed the defendant to manage subscription lists for the claimant’s magazines. The claimant came to seek damages, and the defendant for non-payment of its invoices. The court was now asked whether it was possible to assert a common . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.334194