Balti Hut (Gloucester) Ltd and Mr Ali v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Assessments : Other): FTTTx 21 Mar 2017

VAT and INCOME TAX – quantum – previous decision in principle allowing the appeals in part – parties unable to agree exact figures – determination by Tribunal of exact figures – taxpayers contending that method directed by Tribunal resulted in ‘negative assessments’ for certain periods, which should be aggregated with assessments for other periods to produce a net result –
Held: No – exact figures for VAT, income tax and penalties determined

Citations:

[2017] UKFTT 231 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT, Income Tax

Updated: 24 March 2022; Ref: scu.581657

Bimotor SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Provinciale II of Torino: ECJ 16 Mar 2017

ECJ (Taxation : Value Added Tax Taxation : Value Added Tax – Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax – Principle of fiscal neutrality – National legislation providing for a maximum ceiling limiting the amount of repayment or offsetting of the value added tax credit or surplus

Citations:

ECLI:EU:C:2017:221, [2017] EUECJ C-211/16

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 24 March 2022; Ref: scu.581044

Agenzia delle Entrate v Identi: ECJ 16 Mar 2017

ECJ Principles, Objectives and Tasks of The Treaties Principles, Objectives and Tasks of The Treaties Taxation : Value Added Tax – Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax – Article 4(3) TEU – Sixth Directive – State aid – Procedure discharging bankrupt natural persons from debts (esdebitazione) – Ineligibility of VAT debts

Citations:

ECLI:EU:C:2017:219, [2017] EUECJ C-493/15

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 24 March 2022; Ref: scu.581052

Milkova v Izpalnitelen direktor na Agentsiata za privatizatsia i sledprivatizatsionen control: ECJ 9 Mar 2017

ECJ (Principles, Objectives and Tasks of The Treaties Principles, Objectives and Tasks of The Treaties Social Policy – Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98(2) – Annex III, points 3 and 4 – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Medical treatment using oxygen – Reduced VAT rate – Oxygen cylinders – Standard rate of VAT – Oxygen concentrators

Citations:

ECLI:EU:C:2017:189, [2017] EUECJ C-406/15

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.580713

Etat belge v Oxycure Belgium: ECJ 9 Mar 2017

ECJ (Taxation : Value Added Tax Taxation : Value Added Tax – Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98(2) – Annex III, points 3 and 4 – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Medical treatment using oxygen – Reduced VAT rate – Oxygen cylinders – Standard rate of VAT – Oxygen concentrators

Judges:

E. Regan, P

Citations:

ECLI:EU:C:2017:189, [2017] EUECJ C-573/15

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.580714

Swanage Sea Rowing Club v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Construction of New Boathouse for Charitable Sea Rowing Club): FTTTx 27 Oct 2020

VAT – construction of new boathouse for charitable sea rowing club – zero rating – whether building intended solely for use otherwise than in the course or furtherance of a business – held no – whether building intended solely for use as a village hall or similarly in providing social or recreational facilities for a local community – held no – whether reasonable excuse for issue of zero-rating certificate – held yes – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2020] UKFTT 427 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.655350

Crow Metals Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Denial of Input Tax): FTTTx 23 Oct 2020

VAT – denial of input tax – 403 purchases of scrap metal – whether or not the deals were connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT – yes – whether or not the appellant should have known that the deals were connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT – no – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2020] UKFTT 423 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.655326

CCA Distribution Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 23 Nov 2017

Judges:

Lord Justice David Richards

Citations:

[2017] EWCA Civ 1899, [2017] BVC 60, [2017] STI 2684, [2018] STC 206

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromCCA Distribution Ltd v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 22-Apr-2013
FTTTX VAT – input tax – right to deduct – MTIC fraud alleged – Mobilx guidelines – standard of proof – knowledge of fraud needed – contra-trading – admissibility of evidence – adequacy of circumstantial evidence . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.599607

Rap Group Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 16 Nov 2000

Where the chain of supplies was broken by an exempt supply, the taxpayer could not reclaim input VAT on supplies purchased in order to provide those exempt supplies. The supply of professional services to support the issuance of shares was exempt, and no VAT was reclaimable even though there were components which involved a non-exempt supply. The directness and immediacy of the connection was a matter of fact in each case.

Citations:

Times 16-Nov-2000, Gazette 23-Nov-2000

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.85668

Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich v Marszalek Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej: ECJ 7 Mar 2017

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Point 6 of Annex III – Validity – Procedure – Amendment of a proposal for a Council directive after the Parliament has given an opinion – No fresh consultation of the Parliament – Article 98(2) – Validity – Reduced rate of VAT precluded from being applied to the supply of digital books electronically – Principle of equal treatment – Comparability of two situations – Supply of digital books electronically and on all physical means of support

Citations:

ECLI:EU:C:2017:174, [2017] EUECJ C-390/15

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.579684

CCA Distribution Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 22 Apr 2013

FTTTX VAT – input tax – right to deduct – MTIC fraud alleged – Mobilx guidelines – standard of proof – knowledge of fraud needed – contra-trading – admissibility of evidence – adequacy of circumstantial evidence – evidence as to grey market trading patterns – independence of expert witnesses – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2013] UKFTT 253 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromCCA Distribution Ltd v Revenue and Customs CA 23-Nov-2017
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.491852

Smithers v Revenue and Customs (VAT DIY Housebuilders Scheme – Claim Refused): FTTTx 30 Sep 2020

VAT DIY HOUSEBUILDERS’ SCHEME – claim refused by HMRC on basis that works did not amount to construction of a building and the previous building had not ceased to exist – whether corner site and double facade retained as a condition or requirement of planning approval – whether reconstruction of an existing building – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2020] UKFTT 380 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.655317

K D Media Publishing Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 22 Aug 2018

VAT – Administration : Accounting and Payment – default surcharge – can VAT credit under s 80 Value Added Tax Act 1994 be set against VAT for earlier periods which has already been paid – no – is a mistaken overpayment of VAT a reasonable excuse for late payment of VAT in respect of a subsequent VAT period – no – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2018] UKFTT 494 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.632253

OWD Ltd (T/A Birmingham Cash and Carry) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 22 Aug 2018

PROCEDURE – withdrawal of appeals against VAT and excise duty assessments, associated penalties and refusal of AWRS approval – late applications for reinstatement – whether power to reinstate under rule 17 FTT rules was precluded by s 85(4) VATA – yes – whether (if power existed) extension of time should be permitted – yes – whether appeals should be reinstated on the facts – no

Citations:

[2018] UKFTT 497 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.632266

Minister Finansow v Posnania Investment SA: ECJ 16 Feb 2017

ECJ (Advocate Generals Opinion) Request for a preliminary ruling – Tax law – Common system of value added tax – Taxable transactions – Supply for consideration – Taxable person acting as such – Taxability of the transfer of property in lieu of payment in discharge of a tax debt

Citations:

ECLI:EU:C:2017:134, [2017] EUECJ C-36/16 – O

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.579663

Eurostar Telecom Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 21 Jan 2011

VAT – MTIC fraud – whether trader entitled to recover input tax – whether transactions formed part of transaction chain which was connected with VAT fraud – yes – whether trader knew or should have known its transactions were connected with VAT fraud – trader knew of connection – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 75 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.442802

Ican Finance v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 25 Jan 2011

VAT – registration – sole trader having two separate businesses – whether businesses are separate taxable persons – whether VAT registration covers all the business activities of the registered person – Flat Rate Scheme – whether relevant turnover includes VAT exempt supplies.

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 81 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.442809

George v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Personal Liability Notice Following Mtic Assessment): FTTTx 24 Nov 2021

VAT – Personal Liability Notice following MTIC assessment – application for permission to make a late appeal – delay of almost 5 years – no good reason for most of that period – no realistic chance of succeeding in the appeal – application refused

Citations:

[2021] UKFTT 444 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.671529

Mathieson v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: OHCS 17 Jun 1999

A taxpayer acting upon misleading advice from a customs official which led to an overpayment of VAT, the taxpayer was entitled to the repayment together with interest on the overpaid sum. That advice was incomplete rather than erroneous as such did not decide the issue.

Citations:

Times 17-Jun-1999

Statutes:

Value Added Tax Act 1994 78(1)(a)

Jurisdiction:

Scotland

VAT

Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.83475

PTGI-ICS Limited v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Other): FTTTx 10 Jan 2022

Missing Trader Intra Community fraud in Electronic Communication Services. Whether the Appellant knew or ought to have known that the relevant transactions were connected with fraud.
Held: no. Axel-Kittel v Belgium; Belgium v Recolta Recycling [2006] ECR 1-6161 and Mobilix Ltd (In Administration) v HMRC; HMRC v Blue Sphere Global Ltd,; Calltel Telecom Ltd and another v HMRC [2010] EWCA Civ 517 considered and applied.

Citations:

[2022] UKFTT 20 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.671511

BPP University College of Professional Studies Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Zero-Rating : Books Etc): FTTTx 21 Jun 2018

VAT – supply of tuition by one company and supply of printed material by another company in same corporate, but different VAT, group – whether Notes (2) and (3) of Group 3 Sch 8 apply to remove printed material from zero rate – not on facts – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2018] UKFTT 454 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.622359

First Agency Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Repayments : VAT – Repayments): FTTTx 12 Jul 2018

VALUE ADDED TAX – claim for overpaid VAT – whether claim made within time limit – whether conditions for valid claim met – alternative bad debt relief claim – whether claim made within time limit – whether debt was owed – whether debt written off

Citations:

[2018] UKFTT 391 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.622376

Revenue and Customs v Laurence Donnelly: UTTC 26 Nov 2021

VAT – Penalty – Personal liability notice – whether FTT erred by deciding that HMRC had failed to prove the amount of the penalty – yes – as the relevant matter was not in dispute – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2021] UKUT 296 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.671217

Brooks v Revenue and Customs (Customs Duty and VAT – Transfer of Residency Relief – Brexit – Covid 19): FTTTx 3 Dec 2021

CUSTOMS DUTY and VAT ? Transfer of Residency Relief – Brexit – Covid 19 – Normal Residency – Date of change – Exceptional Circumstances/Waiver – Not proven – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2021] UKFTT 449 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT, Customs and Excise

Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.671537

Vereniging Noordelijke Land- En Tuinbouw Organisatie: ECJ 12 Feb 2009

Sixth VAT Directive Goods and services forming part of the assets of a business for use in taxable transactions and in transactions other than taxable transactions Right to an immediate and full deduction of the tax paid in respect of the acquisition of such goods and services

Citations:

[2009] EUECJ C-515/07

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Citing:

OpimionVereniging Noordelijke Land- En Tuinbouw Organisatie ECJ 22-Dec-2008
Europa (Taxation) Articles 6 (2), first subparagraph, and 17 of the Sixth VAT Directive Goods and services used partly for the needs of the undertaking and partly for non-economic activities Concept of’ . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.578898

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 13 Jan 2017

UTTC VAT – Input Tax – Fleming claim for recovery of input tax – Substantiation and quantification of claim – Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law in refusing appeal because evidence insufficient – VATA 1994, section – VATR 1995, reg 37 Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, rule 35 Appeal refused. Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) ON APPEAL FROM THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (TAX CHAMBER) : [2015] UKFTT 119 (TC)

Citations:

[2017] UKUT 19 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.577808

HM Revenue and Customs v London Clubs Management Ltd: CA 18 Nov 2011

‘This appeal concerns the way in which VAT on supplies to a business, which itself makes both supplies subject to VAT and supplies exempt from VAT, is to be apportioned where the inputs are not directly attributable to either the business’s taxable or exempt supplies alone but are attributable to both. In technical terms, it concerns the circumstances in which the taxpayer can establish that, rather than the standard method of attribution, which is based on the relative contribution to turnover of the different business activities, the attribution of residual input tax should be based on an alternative method, a Partial Exemption Special Method (‘PESM’).’

Judges:

Ward, Etherton, Pitchford LJJ

Citations:

[2011] EWCA Civ 1323, [2011] BVC 406, [2011] STI 3187, [2012] STC 388

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.448405

Astra Zeneca UK Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTx 16 Jan 2009

FTTTx VAT – supply by Appellant of face value vouchers to its employees under contracts of employment – is art. 2(1) of Sixth Directive [now art. 2(1)(a) of Principal VAT Directive] to be interpreted as indicating that provision of vouchers constitutes a supply of services for consideration? – if no, is art. 6(2)(b) [now art. 26(1)(b)] to be interpreted as requiring provision of vouchers to be treated as supply of services where vouchers to be used by employees for private purposes? – if provision of vouchers neither supply of services for consideration within art. 2(1) nor is to be treated as supply of services under art 6(2)(b), is art. 17(2) to be interpreted as permitting employer to recover VAT incurred in purchasing and providing vouchers to employees in circumstances where vouchers to be used for employees’ private purposes – reference to ECJ of all 3 questions

Citations:

[2009] UKFTT 135 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.373580

Belgian State v Nathalie De Fruytier: ECJ 3 Jun 2010

Europa Sixth VAT Directive Article 13(A)(1)(d) Exemptions for activities in the public interest Supply of human organs, blood and milk – Activity of transporting, in a self-employed capacity, human organs and samples for hospitals and laboratories – Concepts of ‘supply of goods’ and ‘supply of services’ – Distinguishing criteria.

Citations:

C-237/09, [2010] EUECJ C-237/09, [2010] STI 1671, [2010] BVC 740, [2010] STC 1792

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.416448

Pink Eco Clean v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 8 Nov 2018

VAT – inaccuracies in returns – Schedule 24 to Finance Act 2007 – omissions in invoicing associate business for services supplied – whether inaccuracies -‘careless’ – under-statement of the value of deemed supply on de-registration – whether behaviour – ‘deliberate’ – whether special reductions – appeal allowed in part

Citations:

[2018] UKFTT 658 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.632409

Redman v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 24 Feb 2017

(Vat – Builders : Do -It-Yourself) VALUE ADDED TAX – DIY Housebuilders Scheme – construction of new build house – whether designed as a dwelling for purposes of subsection (35)(1A)(a) and Note (2)(c) to Group 5 of Schedule 8 to VAT Act 1994 – whether Section 75 agreement amounted to a prohibition – yes – appeal refused

Citations:

[2017] UKFTT 199 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT, Construction

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.578536

Gayle (T/A Photogen Promo Music Adverts Ltd and Photogen Pma Ltd) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Mar 2017

(Vat – Registration : Cancellation of) VAT – compulsory deregistration – whether there was a viable business for entitlement to register for VAT – refusal of input VAT claims – whether input tax creditable – penalty for inaccuracies in VAT returns – category downgraded from ‘deliberate’ to ‘failure to take reasonable care’ – whether special circumstances – appeals dismissed

Citations:

[2017] UKFTT 211 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.578549

Right International Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 21 Feb 2017

(Vat – Penalties : Default Surcharge) VALUE ADDED TAX – default surcharge – Section 59 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether there was a reasonable excuse for the default – no – whether the penalty was disproportionate to the default – no – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2017] UKFTT 207 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Value Added Tax Act 1994 59

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.578539

Lok v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Feb 2017

(Vat – Assessments : Best Judgment) VALUE ADDED TAX – Takeaway business – Assessed as liable for registration but no longer liable – Assessment raised – Whether assessment to best judgment? – Yes – Whether assessment should be adjusted? – No – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2017] UKFTT 169 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedVan Boeckel v Customs and Excise Commissioners 1981
The court explained the meaning of the requirement that a tax assessment made by the Commissioners should be the ‘best of their judgment’: ‘the Tribunal should not treat an assessment as invalid merely because they disagree as to how the judgment . .
CitedPegasus Birds Ltd v Commissioners of HM Customs and Excise CA 27-Jul-2004
The taxpayer complained that the assessment imposed by the Commissioners was wholly unreasonable, and void. The tribunal had found the assessment wholly unreasonable, but the High Court had allowed the Commissioners’ appeal.
Held: There was no . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.578526

Promo International Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 10 Feb 2017

FTTTx (Vat – Penalties : Other) VAT – penalties -inaccuracies in return-whether careless or deliberate-repeated errors-responsibility of taxpayer for acts of employed accountant-special reduction-whether officer’s decision unreasonable-suspension of penalties-whether officer’s decision unreasonable

Citations:

[2017] UKFTT 161 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.578532

Eyedial Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Jan 2011

Input tax ? trader acting as ‘broker’ in sales of mobile phones ? fraudulent defaults by traders in chains or related chains ? whether trader knew or ought to have known of connection with fraud ? yes ? appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 47 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.442803

Chain Telecommunications Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 8 May 2012

VAT – input tax – invoices rendered to another company but paid by Appellant – whether VAT paid by Appellant constituted input tax – held, on facts, no – services neither supplied to Appellant nor used by Appellant for purpose of its business despite commercial justification for payment of invoices – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2012] UKFTT 330 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.462729

Douglas v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 13 Jul 2021

VALUE ADDED TAX – best judgment assessment – whether FTT erred in making factual findings beyond the agreed issues – whether FTT failed to take into account relevant evidence – whether FTT made a finding not available to it on the evidence – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2021] UKUT 163 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 February 2022; Ref: scu.671195

Hoylake Cottage Hospital Charitable Trust v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Jan 2011

VAT – construction of kitchen and laundry facilities at hospital – whether an additional unit and therefore standard rated or a continuation of development of the hospital and zero rated – building part of the original development and therefore zero rated – appeal allowed.

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 48 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 05 February 2022; Ref: scu.442808

Westminster Trading Ltd and Others v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 25 Jan 2017

UTTC PROCEDURE – MTIC appeals- refusal of application to adjourn substantive hearing of appeals in circumstances where appellants’ representative and main witness unfit to participate in the proceedings – whether decision not to adjourn within the ambit of the proper exercise of judicial discretion in the circumstances-yes – appeals dismissed

Citations:

[2017] UKUT 23 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Taxes Management, VAT

Updated: 04 February 2022; Ref: scu.577812

Taylor Wimpey Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 7 Feb 2017

VAT – Builder’s Block restricting deduction of input tax for certain items on a supply of a new dwelling – whether block, or further restrictions from 1984 and 1987, unlawful under EU law – meaning of ‘incorporates . . in any part of the building or its site’ – meaning of ‘ordinarily installed by builders as fixtures’.

Citations:

[2017] UKUT 34 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT, Construction

Updated: 04 February 2022; Ref: scu.577819

Revenue and Customs v Wheels Private Hire Ltd: UTTC 8 Feb 2017

UTTC VAT – rental of taxis – optional insurance – Article 135(1)(a) Directive 2006/112/EC – section 31 and group 2 Schedule 9 VATA94 VAT Act 1994 – whether insurance transaction for VAT purposes – yes – whether single supply of leasing of insured vehicle or separate supplies of vehicle and insurance – separate supplies – appeal dismissed.

Citations:

[2017] UKUT 51 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 04 February 2022; Ref: scu.577818

Swanfield Ltd, QN Hotels (Wrexham) Ltd and Others v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 2 Mar 2017

UTTC VAT – default surcharge – whether appellants could appropriate payments made to VAT not yet due – yes – whether in absence of appropriation a surcharge would be disproportionate if it could have been avoided had HMRC allocate payments differently – no – FTT decision set aside and case remitted for additional findings

Citations:

[2017] UKUT 88 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 04 February 2022; Ref: scu.577823

Birmingham Road Motors and Others v Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax – Claims for Repayment of Overpaid Output Tax): FTTTx 15 May 2020

VALUE ADDED TAX – claims for repayment of overpaid output tax – motor traders – application to amend grounds of appeal – whether amendment to existing claims or new claims which would be out of time – application refused

Citations:

[2020] UKFTT 245 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 03 February 2022; Ref: scu.652262

Europcar Group Uk Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax – Single Composite Supply or Multiple Supplies): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020

VALUE ADDED TAX – single composite supply or multiple supplies – car hire company providing children’s car seat to customers – car seat was optional ‘extra’ and car seat customers had genuine option to supply their own car seats – key principles in Middle Temple considered – held: car hire and car seat hire were independent supplies – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2020] UKFTT 249 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 03 February 2022; Ref: scu.652283

Babylon Farm Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 9 Sep 2021

VALUE ADDED TAX – disallowance of input tax – whether necessary for HMRC to deregister taxpayer before disallowing input tax – whether taxpayer carrying on a business – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2021] UKUT 224 (TCC), [2021] STI 2106, [2021] STC 1913, [2021] BVC 513

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 02 February 2022; Ref: scu.671201

Whistl UK Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 23 Oct 2014

Whether the exemption from Value Added Tax (‘VAT’) conferred by United Kingdom primary legislation in respect of the supply of regulated ‘access services’ by Royal Mail Group, the Interested Party, as a designated provider of universal postal services, is consistent with EU law. The resolution of this issue turns upon the correct interpretation of the judgment of the European Court of Justice in R (on the application of TNT Post UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (case C-357/07) [2009] STC 1438

Judges:

The Honourable Mr Justice Kenneth Parker

Citations:

[2014] EWHC 3480 (Admin), [2015] STC 1077, [2014] STI 3175, [2015] BVC 2

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 02 February 2022; Ref: scu.537987

Sub One Limited T/A Subway v HM Revenue and Customs: UTTC 3 Oct 2012

Value Added Tax – zero-rating – Value Added Tax Act 1994 Schedule 8 Part II Group 1 Note (3)(b)(i) – food – toasted sandwiches and meatball marinara – whether heated for the purposes of enabling it to be consumed at temperature above ambient air temperature – whether legislation and/or interpretation and/or application thereof infringed principle of fiscal neutrality – whether FTT findings irrational – application to adduce further evidence.

Citations:

[2012] UKUT 34 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 February 2022; Ref: scu.466702

Vehicle Control Services v HM Revenue and Customs 129: UTTC 2 May 2012

VALUE ADDED TAX – supply of parking control services – whether parking charges collected and retained by operator were consideration for a supply – whether outside the scope of VAT as damages for trespass or damages for breach of a contract between the operator and the motorist – whether additional consideration payable by landowner for provision of parking control services – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), [2012] BVC 1690, [2012] STC 2065

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 February 2022; Ref: scu.466674

Vehicle Control Services v HM Revenue and Customs 131: UTTC 2 May 2012

UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – supply of parking control services – whether parking charges collected and retained by operator were consideration for a supply – whether outside the scope of VAT as damages for trespass or damages for breach of a contract between the operator and the motorist – whether additional consideration payable by landowner for provision of parking control services – appeal dismissed

Judges:

Berner, Aleksander TJJ

Citations:

[2012] UKUT 131 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 01 February 2022; Ref: scu.460113

Knut Hamann v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbuettel: ECJ 15 Mar 1989

Tax provisions – Harmonization of laws – Turnover taxes – Common system of value-added tax – ‘Forms of transport’ within the meaning of the Sixth Directive – Sailing yachts – Covered – Hiring – Place where the service is deemed to be supplied for tax purposes
(Council Directive 77/388/EEC, Art . 9(1) and ( 2)(d))
Ocean-going sailing yachts that are used by their hirers for the practice of the sport of sailing are forms of transport within the meaning of Article 9(2)(d ) of the Sixth Directive ( 77/388/EEC ) on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States on turnover taxes . Therefore the place where the service of hiring them out is supplied is, in conformity with the general principle laid down in Article 9(1 ) of the directive, deemed to be the place where the supplier has established his business .

Citations:

R-51/88, [1989] EUECJ R-51/88

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

VAT

Updated: 31 January 2022; Ref: scu.215677

Deandrake Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Apr 2011

VAT – alleged MTIC fraud – whether the Appellant knew or ought to have known that its transactions were connected with the fraudulent evasion of VAT- appeal dismissed on basis that whilst the Appellant did not know that its transactions were connected with fraud the Appellant ought to have known

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 250 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 31 January 2022; Ref: scu.442972

Revenue and Customs v British Film Institute: UTTC 12 Aug 2014

VALUE ADDED TAX – exemption for cultural services – supplies of right of admission to cinema by body governed by public law – whether Article 13A(1)(n) Sixth Directive sufficiently clear and precise to have direct effect – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2014] BVC 534, [2014] UKUT 370 (TCC), [2015] STC 99

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 January 2022; Ref: scu.537622

Excel RTI Solutions Ltd (In Administration) v The Commissioners of Customs and Excise: FTTTx 27 Oct 2010

AVOIDANCE – Abuse of rights – Input tax – Mobile phones – FCIB chains – Some Contra trades – Whether purchases connected with fraudulent evasion – Whether Appellant knew or should have known – Mobilx [2010] STC 1436, CA – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2010] UKFTT 519 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 January 2022; Ref: scu.426613

The British Association of Leisure Parks, Piers and Attractions Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 12 Oct 2011

FTTTx EXEMPTION – Trade Association – Primary purpose – Whether association’s primary purpose was making representations to the government on legislation and other public matters – No – Whether association restricted membership wholly or mainly to members whose business interests were directly connected with the purposes of the association – No – VATA 1994 Schedule 9 para 9 item 1 and Note 5(d)
UNJUST ENRICHMENT – Exemption – Claim for repayment of VAT overpaid – Whether unjust enrichment provisions apply – VATA 1994 s80(3)

Judges:

SirStephen Oliver QC

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 662 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Value Added Taxes Act 1994 80(3)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 January 2022; Ref: scu.449598

TLC Incentives Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 7 Sep 2011

Appeal against VAT default surcharge – Appellant had installed new accounting system and first attempt to file the VAT return – correcting the error took longer than anticipated but Appellant did not contact HMRC – appeal dismissed – Appellant had no reasonable excuse

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 617 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 January 2022; Ref: scu.449586

Helianthus (London) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Jan 2014

PROCEDURE – Permission to extend time to appeal- VAT security dispute – factors from UT decision in Data Select [2012] UKUT 187 (TCC) applied – whether extra prejudice to HMRC where delay arose in VAT security appeals – no – taking account of appellant’s explanation, length of delay, purpose of time limits and respective prejudice to parties (which in the case of the appellant included being subject to criminal proceedings) interests of justice served by granting permission to appeal out of time

Citations:

[2014] UKFTT 52 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 January 2022; Ref: scu.521700

Canotec Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 12 Oct 2011

INPUT TAX – Supply for a consideration – Payment made by equipment dealer to finance leasing company – Payment was consideration for termination of existing finance leasing agreement relating to old equipment – Payment made as part of deal by which customer under existing finance leasing agreement agrees to enter into new leasing agreement of upgraded agreement – Whether VAT charged on payment is input tax of equipment dealer – Yes – VATA 1994 s.24(1)

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 661 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 January 2022; Ref: scu.449599

City YMCA London v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Other): FTTTx 17 Dec 2021

VAT – characterisation of supply – provision of accommodation to homeless young people – land exemption for – ‘the leasing or letting of immovable property’ – whether supply a – ‘licence to occupy land’ within Group 1 Schedule 9 VATA land exemption – legal classification by reference to – ‘exclusive possession’ and Community law criterion – ‘to the exclusion of all others’ – whether supply falls within Directive hotel exclusion – a functional approach and purposive construction for – ‘similar establishment’ under Item 1(d) exclusion from land exemption – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2021] UKFTT 477 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 30 January 2022; Ref: scu.671542

Associated Newspapers Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 10 Feb 2017

This appeal is concerned with the VAT consequences (in respect of both input and output tax) of two promotional schemes carried out by Associated Newspapers Limited (‘ANL’) in order to boost the circulation of the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday.

Judges:

Jackson, Patten, Black LJJ

Citations:

[2017] EWCA Civ 54

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT, Media

Updated: 29 January 2022; Ref: scu.574290

Wicked Wang Promotions v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Registration : Cancellation of): FTTTx 24 Jan 2017

VALUE ADDED TAX – compulsory retrospective deregistration – whether or not appellant was registerable on the date in question – held yes – appeal allowed – second registration made by appellant – whether valid registration – held not – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2017] UKFTT 100 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 29 January 2022; Ref: scu.574073

Wetheralds Construction Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Dec 2016

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX — Reduced rate Schedule 7A VATA – supplies of insulation for roofs Note 1(a) Group 2 – whether appellant’s Solid Roof System for conservatories a single supply: yes – nature of that single supply: supply of insulation system involving tiling of roof – whether supply insulation for roofs: yes – appeal allowed.

Citations:

[2016] UKFTT 827 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 29 January 2022; Ref: scu.574012

Highlake Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Dec 2016

FTTTx (Income Tax and National Insurance Contributions) Income Tax and National Insurance Contributions (NICs) – security for payment of PAYE and NICs – Income Tax Pay as You Earn Regulations 2003, Part 4a – Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001, Sch 4 – Value Added Tax – security for payment of VAT -para 4 Sch 11 Value added Tax act 1994 – no arrears at date of decision – whether requirement justified – whether supervisory or appellate jurisdiction – supervisory – reasonableness of decision – information available at date of decision only – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2016] UKFTT 808 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Income Tax, VAT, Taxes – Other

Updated: 29 January 2022; Ref: scu.573987

Hamma v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Dec 2016

FTTTx (Excise Duty Civil Penalty (See Also Excise Hydrocarbon Oil [Duty]) : Evasion) EXCISE DUTY – CUSTOMS DUTY – IMPORT VAT – civil evasion penalties – 13,160 cigarettes brought through the green channel – whether the test for dishonesty has a subjective element – yes – whether the Appellant was dishonest – yes – whether the penalties should be further mitigated in the circumstances of this case – yes

Citations:

[2016] UKFTT 817 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise, VAT

Updated: 29 January 2022; Ref: scu.573985