Category: Landlord and Tenant

240A Station Road – Barnet : London: LVT 26 Jul 2011

Service Charges

Citations:

[2011] EWLVT LON – LV – SVC – 00AC – 0

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See Also – 240A Station Road – Barnet : London LVT 15-Feb-2011
Service Charges . .

Cited by:

See Also – 240A Station Road – Barnet : London LVT 23-Nov-2017
Service Charges . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 22 September 2022; Ref: scu.446439

Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd: ChD 27 May 2010

The court was asked short point of statutory construction about the meaning of the phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in sections 3 and 4 of the 1993 Act: ‘e only point taken by the defendant freeholder, Craftrule Ltd (‘Craftrule’), in resisting the enfranchisement claim is that the Property comprises two parts, consisting of flats 41-50 and flats 51-60 respectively, each of which (as is also common ground) would itself qualify as a self-contained part of a building within the meaning of section 3, and could not be further sub-divided into smaller self-contained parts. Craftrule’s contention is that a notice may only validly be given in respect of premises which cannot be so sub-divided, or in other words that the statutory right to collective enfranchisement is exercisable only in relation to a self-contained part of a building which does not itself comprise two or more such self-contained parts.’

Judges:

Henderson J

Citations:

[2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch), [2010] WLR (D) 138, [2010] 22 EG 107 (CS), [2010] L and TR 19, [2010] 2 EGLR 45, [2010] NPC 64, [2010] 1 WLR 2046, [2010] 31 EG 64, [2010] 3 All ER 952

Links:

Bailii, WLRD

Statutes:

Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 22 September 2022; Ref: scu.416126

Corporation of London v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Another: CA 21 Dec 2004

Billingsgate and Smithfield markets sought through the Corporation to prevent Covent Garden market allowing the sale of fish and meat.
Held: Parliament could not have intended to allow Covent Garden to carry on an activity in competition with the Smithfield or Billingsgate markets. The grant of a right to hold a market in particular commodities (eg. horticultural produce) imported an implied prohibition on holding a market in any other commodity (eg. meat or fish). Permitting the face-to-face sale of fish or meat at the Nine Elms site was outside the scope of CGMA’s statutory powers and was not an activity that could be brought within those powers by a consent under the section 18(1)(f) proviso.

Citations:

[2004] EWCA Civ 1765, [2005] 1 WLR 1286

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Covent Garden Market Act 1961 18(1)(f)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal from – Corporation of London, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and others HL 21-Jun-2006
The old markets of the City of London enjoyed a common law right to prevent the opening of other markets within seven miles. Covent Garden had granted leases for the sale of products other than vegetables and fruit and wanted to allow the face to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 22 September 2022; Ref: scu.220522

West Hampstead Management Company Ltd v Pearl Property Ltd: CA 26 Jul 2002

Appeal from assessment of compensation on enfranchisement – fixing of correct date

Citations:

[2002] EWCA Civ 1372, [2002] 45 EG 155

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See Also – West Hampstead Management Company Ltd v Pearl Property Ltd CA 10-Jul-2002
Solicitors’ application to be removed from record. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 22 September 2022; Ref: scu.217508