Category: Intellectual Property

Magic Ball (Trade Mark: Revocation): IPO 17 Mar 1999

cw Inter Partes Decisions – Trade Marks – Revocation

Judges:

Mr M Foley

Citations:

REV 9042 / 9043, 1240037, 240907, [1999] UKIntelP o08499

Links:

PO, IPO, Bailii

Cited by:

See Also – Magic Ball (Trade Mark: Opposition) IPO 29-Apr-1999
cw Inter Partes Decisions – Trade Marks – Opposition . .
See Also – Magic Ball (Trade Mark: Opposition) IPO 1-Aug-2000
cw Appeals to the Appointed Person Decisions – Trade Marks – Opposition . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property

Updated: 12 October 2022; Ref: scu.453442

Euroguard (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 26 Mar 1999

cw Inter Partes Decisions – Trade Marks – Opposition

Judges:

Dr W J Trott

Citations:

OPP 47876, 2107451, [1999] UKIntelP o09799

Links:

PO, IPO, Bailii

Cited by:

See Also – Euroguard (Trade Mark: Opposition) IPO 25-Feb-2000
cw Inter Partes Decisions – Trade Marks – Opposition . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property

Updated: 12 October 2022; Ref: scu.453427

Schutz (UK) Ltd and Another v Delta Containers Ltd and Another: ChD 5 Jul 2011

‘This judgment follows the liability-only trial of a claim for trade mark infringement and passing off in relation to products known as rigid composite intermediate bulk containers.’

Judges:

Briggs J

Citations:

[2011] EWHC 1712 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Intellectual Property

Updated: 11 October 2022; Ref: scu.441446

Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Gorgonzola v Kaserei Champignon Hofmeister GmbH and Co KG: ECJ 4 Mar 1999

Upon the registration of a PDO (‘protected designation of origin’) national rules ceased to apply and ‘only the legal rules laid down in the Regulation are, together with the Treaty rules, relevant for the purpose of answering the questions referred about the scope of the protection of the PDO. The protection of the PDO is now guaranteed by Community law.

Citations:

C-87/97, [1999] ECR I-1301

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

Cited – Consorzio Del Prosciutto Di Parma v Asda Stores Limited and others HL 8-Feb-2001
The name ‘Parma Ham’ was controlled as to its use under Italian law, and the associated mark, the ‘corona ducale’, was to be applied to a sale of Parma Ham, including any packaging. Proper Parma Ham was imported and resold through the defendant’s . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Commercial, Intellectual Property

Updated: 11 October 2022; Ref: scu.162066