Category: Immigration

IA307162014: AIT 5 Feb 2016

O’Ryan DUTJ
[2016] UKAITUR IA307162014
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Explained – ex parte Gondolia 1991
In dismissing the claimant’s application for judicial review, Henry J held: ‘Secondly, it is said, and again correctly, that there is no mention in the adjudicator’s determination and reasons that the initiative for the first introduction of the . .

Cited by:
Approved – AA069062014 and Others AIT 30-Aug-2017
Several appellants, all from the same judge, complained of his handling of their cases.
Held: The complaints about the decisions were entirely well-founded: ‘Nobody reading them could detect how the judge reached the conclusion he did, acting . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 07 October 2021; Ref: scu.571717

PD and Others (Article 8 : Conjoined Family Claims) Sri Lanka: UTIAC 17 Mar 2016

UTIAC In considering the conjoined Article 8 ECHR claims of multiple family members decision-makers should first apply the Immigration Rules to each individual applicant and, if appropriate, then consider Article 8 outside the Rules. This exercise will typically entail the consideration and determination of all claims jointly, so as to ensure that all material facts and considerations are taken into account in each case.
McCloskey P J, Bruce UTJ
[2016] UKUT 108 (IAC), [2016] Imm AR 797
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 8
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – KO (Nigeria) and Others v Secretary of State for The Home Department SC 24-Oct-2018
The Court considered linked issues as to the treatment of ‘qualifying children’ and their parents, under the statutory regime contained in Part 5A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Otherwise NS (Sri Lanka) and others v . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 07 October 2021; Ref: scu.564167