ECJ Judgment – Failure to fulfill obligations – Directive 2000/60/EC – Politics of the European Union in the field of water – Management Plans basin district – Publication – Failure to notify the European Commission

C-190/14, [2014] EUECJ C-190/14, ECLI: EU: C: 2014 : 2341
Bailii
Directive 2000/60/EC

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538467

ECJ Judgment – Erasmus Mundus Action Programme – Framework Convention Partnership – Specific Grant Agreement – Decision of the Executive Agency to terminate the framework agreement and the specific agreement to amend – Administrative Proceedings before the Commission – Commission Decision of rejection administrative appeal as unfounded – Breach of conventions and the Administrative and Financial Handbook

A. Dittrich, P
T-283/12, [2014] EUECJ T-283/12, ECLI:EU:T:2014:933
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538470

ECJ Judgment – Appeal – EAGGF EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from funding from the European Union – Expenditures by the Netherlands

C-610/13, [2014] EUECJ C-610/13, ECLI: EU: C: 2014: 2349
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538474

ECJ Judgment – Public Service – Official Intern – Article 34 of the Statute – Internship Report establishing the manifest inability of the trainee – Extension of the probationary period – Reassignment – Dismissal at the end of the probationary period – Conditions of the practicum – Insufficient professional – Duty of care – Principle of sound administration

F-4/14, [2014] EUECJ F-4/14
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538468

ECJ Judgment – EAGGF – Guarantee Section – EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from funding – Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 – Plan of single payment entitlements – Sincere cooperation – Equity – Proportionality – National Reserve – Award criteria – Financial Correction lump – Risk for the Fund – Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 – Wine sector – Plans distillation and payments for the use of certain musts – Aid for the restructuring and conversion of vineyards

T-632/11, [2014] EUECJ T-632/11
Bailii
Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538471

ECJ Judgment – Appeal – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Regional Operational Programme (ROP) 2000-2006 Campania – Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 – Article 32, paragraph 3, paragraph f) – infringement procedure against Italy concerning the management of waste in the Campania region – Decision not to make interim payments for the measurement of POR on the management and disposal of waste

C-385/13, [2014] EUECJ C-385/13, ECLI: EU: C: 2014: 2350
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538472

Radiation

Advocate General, M. Szpunar
C-54/14, [2014] EUECJ C-54/14 – CO, ECLI: EU: C: 2014: 2329
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538300

ECJ Judgment – Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Refusal of recruitment – Existence of a degree consistent with the notice of competition due to homologation – Financial and Non-pecuniary damage

T-669/13, [2014] EUECJ T-669/13, ECLI: EU: T: 2014 929
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538302

ECJ Judgment – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures against Syria – Freezing of funds – Functions of the Governor of Central Bank of Syria – Action for annulment – Notice of an instrument of restrictive measures – Limitation of Actions – Admissibility – Rights of the defense – Fair trial – Obligation to state reasons – Burden of proof – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Right to property – The right to private and family life – Application for admission to restrictions a national of a Member State – Free movement of EU citizens

G. Berardis (Rapporteur), P
T-307/12, [2014] EUECJ T-307/12, ECLI: EU: T: 2014 : 926
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538304

ECJ Judgment – State aid – Aid to support the deployment of next generation broadband networks in the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly region – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Action for annulment – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Locus standi – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Partial inadmissibility – No doubts which justify initiating the formal investigation procedure

G. Berardis, P
T-362/10, [2014] EUECJ T-362/10, ECLI:EU:T:2014:928
Bailii
TFEU 107(3)(c)

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538305

ECJ 1. The rejection by the Commission of a proposed undertaking in the course of an anti-dumping proceeding is not a measure having binding legal effects of such a kind as to affect the interests of the traders concerned, because the Commission may revoke its decision or the Council may decide not to introduce an anti-dumping duty. Such a rejection is an intermediate measure whose purpose is to prepare for the final decision, and is not therefore a measure which may be challenged by an action for its annulment.
It is by challenging the regulation introducing definitive anti-dumping duties that traders can raise any irregularity associated with the rejection of their proposed undertakings.
2. Regulations introducing an anti-dumping duty are legislative in nature and scope, inasmuch as they apply to all traders generally. Nevertheless, it is conceivable that some provisions of those regulations may be of direct and individual concern to those producers and exporters of the product in question who are alleged on the basis of information about their business activities to be dumping.
This is true in general of producers and exporters who are able to establish that they were identified in the measures adopted by the Commission or the Council or were concerned by the preliminary investigations. The same is true of those importers whose resale prices were taken into account for the construction of export prices, and those traders, limited in number and identified by the institutions, whose business dealings with the producer of the products concerned display particular features which were taken into account in the construction of the normal value and in the calculation of the weighted dumping margin on the basis of which the anti-dumping duty was fixed.
3. No miscalculation of the dumping margin may be said to occur where the institutions determine it solely at the stage of the exporting manufacturer without establishing separate margins for specific exporters, on the ground that those exporters are not established in the country of exportation and do not sell the products complained of on the domestic market of the country of exportation, and therefore the dumping can be attributed only to the exporting manufacturer.
4. The attitude of a trading partner – even a major partner – of the Community towards protection against dumping does not suffice to oblige the Community to follow the same course when applying its own legislation on the matter.
5. For the calculation of the anti-dumping duty, Article 13(3 ) of Regulation No 2176/84 merely requires the institutions not to exceed either the dumping margin established or the extent of the injury, if a duty lower than the dumping margin would be adequate to remove the injury. The institutions thus enjoy a wide discretion in choosing the method for calculating the duty and are not obliged to adopt for that purpose the same method as that used for determining the dumping margin.
6. The imposition of an anti-dumping duty at a standard rate applicable to all imports of a given product does not, even though it may not have the same effect on the profit margins of different importers, infringe the principle prohibiting discrimination; that difference in the effects of the duty is the result not of the introduction of the duty but of the sales policy of the exporting manufacturer, and the introduction of an anti-dumping duty seeks to remove the injury caused to Community producers and not to ensure that all importers enjoy the same profit margin.
7. Article 10 of Regulation No 2176/84 does not rule out the possibility for the Commission of accepting an undertaking offered by an importer, but its wording implies that such an undertaking may be accepted only in exceptional cases. Article 10(4) and (6), dealing with the continuation of the investigation after the acceptance of undertakings and the introduction of anti-dumping duties after the withdrawal of an undertaking or the discovery that it has been infringed, refers only to exporters, that is to say, those traders whose undertakings may a priori be accepted.

[1990] EUECJ C-133/87
Bailii
Citing:
See Also – Nashua Corporation and Others v Commission and Council ECJ 25-Jun-1987
ECJ It does not lie within the jurisdiction of the judge hearing an application for interim measures to allow a request for the suspension of the operation of a council regulation imposing a definitive . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538248

ECJ Referred – Projects funded by the European Union in the field of research and technological development – Decision refusing to participate in some projects – Application for stay of execution – Lack of formal requirements – Inadmissibility

T-706/14, [2014] EUECJ T-706/14 – CO
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538233

ECJ Preliminary reference – State aid – Definition of state intervention or through State resources’ – Companies holding facilities of electrical energy – Extraordinary Funding

J-C Bonichot, P
C-275/13, [2014] EUECJ C-275/13 – CO, ECLI: EU: C: 2014: 2314
Bailii

European

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.538232

ECFI Judgment

T-29/11, [2014] EUECJ T-29/11
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.538026

The applicant company sought judicial review to prevent implementation and transposition of the Directive into UK law, saying that the Directive was invalid.

Turner J
[2014] EWHC 3515 (Admin)
Bailii
Directive 2014/40/EU
England and Wales

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.538022

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Industrial policy – Directive 2001/83/EC – Medicinal products for human use – Article 6 – Marketing authorisation – Article 8(3)(i) – Requirement to attach to the application for authorisation the results of pharmaceutical pre-clinical tests and clinical trials – Derogations relating to pre-clinical tests and clinical trials – Article 10 – Generic medicinal products – Concept of ‘reference medicinal product’ – Whether the holder of a marketing authorisation for a reference medicinal product has an individual right to oppose the marketing authorisation of a generic of the reference product – Article 10a – Medicinal products of which the active substances have been in well-established medicinal use within the European Union for at least 10 years – Whether it is possible to use a medicinal product for which authorisation has been granted on the basis of the derogation provided for in Article 10a as a reference medicinal product for the purpose of obtaining a marketing authorisation for a generic product

T von Danwitz, P
C-104/13, [2014] EUECJ C-104/13
Bailii
Directive 2001/83/EC 8(3)(1)

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.538006

ECJ Judgment – Failure to comply with a judgment of the Court establishing a breach of State – Penalty payment – liquidation of the penalty decision – Obligation to recover – Enterprises subject of bankruptcy proceedings – subject of bankruptcy proceedings involved – Diligence required – Burden of proof

T-268/13, [2014] EUECJ T-268/13, ECLI: EU: T: 2014: 90
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537953

ECJ Appeal – Cohesion fund – Reduction of financial assistance – Irregularities in the application of the public procurement legislation – Adoption of the decision by the European Commission – Failure to comply with the time-limit – Consequences

S. Rodin, P
C-429/13, [2014] EUECJ C-429/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2310
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537954

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Regulation (EC) No 612/2009 – Export refunds – Regulation (EC) No 376/2008 – System of export licences – Export declaration submitted before the export licence was issued – Export carried out during the period of validity of the export licence – Rectification of irregularities

A. Borg Barthet, P
C-387/13, [2014] EUECJ C-387/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2296
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537705

ECFI Judgment – Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2011 promotion exercise – Rate Multiplication – Contradictory

MM. M. Jaeger, P
T-26/14, [2014] EUECJ T-26/14, ECLI: EU: T: 2014 887
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537704

ECFI Judgment – Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark GRAPHENE – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7, paragraph 1 c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

T-458/13, [2014] EUECJ T-458/13, ECLI: EU T: 2014 891
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537696

ECFI Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Applicability of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict – Possibility for an authority of a third State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Reference to terrorist acts – Need for a decision of a competent authority for the purpose of Common Position 2001/931

F. Dehousse (Rapporteur)
T-208/11, [2014] EUECJ T-208/11, ECLI:EU:T:2014:885
Bailii
Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537698

ECFI Judgment – Non-contractual liability – Public service contracts – Disclosure to third parties by the Commission allegedly harmful information to the reputation of the applicant – Moral prejudice – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals

MM. A. Dittrich, P
T-297/12, [2014] EUECJ T-297/12
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537693

ECFI Judgment – Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark LINEX – Earlier national word mark LINES PERLA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 76(1), in fine, of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

A. Dittrich (Rapporteur), P
T-444/12, [2014] EUECJ T-444/12, ECLI:EU:T:2014:886
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537701

ECJ Judgment – Appeal – EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from Community financing – Expenditure of the Republic of Poland

A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur)
C-273/13, [2014] EUECJ C-273/13, ECLI: EU: C: 2014, 2295
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537702

ECFI Judgment – State aid – Electricity – Preferential tariffs – Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Aid measure fully implemented, in part, as at the date of the decision and, in part, when the action was brought – Inadmissibility

T-517/12, [2014] EUECJ T-517/12, ECLI:EU:T:2014:890
Bailii
TFEU 108(2)
European

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537689

ECJ Judgment – Failure to fulfill obligations – Free movement of goods – Legislation of a Member State requiring certain construction products bearing the marking’ CE ‘comply with additional national standards – Lists of construction rules (‘Bauregellisten’)

C-100/13, [2014] EUECJ C-100/13, ECLI: EU: C: 2014, 2293
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537690

ECJ Judgment – Public service – Officer Trainee – Article 34 of the Statute – Internship Report establishing the inability of the trainee – Extension of the probationary period – Dismissal at the end of the probationary period – Grounds for termination – Performance – Haste in carrying benefits – Manifest errors of assessment – Irregularities in the proceedings – Time limit to the Reports Committee to give its opinion

F-15/14, [2014] EUECJ F-15/14, ECLI: EU: F: 2014: 236 [
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537691

ECJ Judgment – Public service – Officials – Referral to the Court after setting aside – Recruitment – Notice of vacancy internal to the institution – Eligibility in the notice of vacancy – Discretion of the appointing authority

F-55/10, [2014] EUECJ F-55/10
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537609

ECJ Judgment – Civil service – Rights and obligations of officials – Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service – Article 16 of the Staff Regulations – Compatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution – Prohibition

F-86/13, [2014] EUECJ F-86/13
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537611

ECJ Judgment – Appeal – Civil service – Recruitment – Appointment to the post of Director of Human Resources – Rejection of candidature – Obligation to state reasons of the report submitted by the screening committee

T-663/13, [2014] EUECJ T-663/13
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537605

ECJ Judgment – Public service – Officials – Retired civil servant – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary Action – Hold on pension – Hearing of Witness by the Disciplinary Board – Not hearing the official concerned – Breach of right to be heard

F-107/13, [2014] EUECJ F-107/13
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537606

ECFI (Judgment) (French Text) State aid – Aluminium – Preferential Tariff contract awarded by electricity – Decision declaring the aid illegal and incompatible with the internal market – Termination of contract – Suspension judicial, summary proceedings, the effects of the termination of the contract – New aid

M. Prek, P
T-542/11, [2014] EUECJ T-542/11, [2018] EUECJ T-542/11RENV
Bailii, Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537448

ECFI (Judgment) (French Text) Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – illegal activities which affect the interests of the Union – Serious breach of obligations by officials – Articles 12a and 22a of the Staff – Termination by the applicant – Reassignment following such termination – No referral to OLAF by the supervisor who received information – Acts adversely affecting – Good faith – Rights of the defense – Jurisdiction of the perpetrator

MM. M. Jaeger, P
T-530/12, [2014] EUECJ T-530/12, ECLI: EU: T: 2014 860
Bailii
Citing:
See Also – Bermejo Garde v EESC ECFI 8-Oct-2014
ECFI (Judgment) (French Text) Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of vacancy – Appointment to the post of Director – Withdrawal of the Applicant – Appointment of another candidate – . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537450

ECFI (Judgment) (French Text) Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a Community figurative mark representing a star within a circle – Earlier Community and national figurative marks representing a star within a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Revocation of the earlier Community mark – Continued interest in bringing proceedings – Failure to find that there was no need to adjudicate in part

M.E. Martins Ribeiro, P
T-342/12, [2014] EUECJ T-342/12, ECLI:EU:T:2014:858
Bailii

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537451

ECFI (Judgment) Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark dodie – Earlier national word marks DODOT – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

T-122/13, [2014] EUECJ T-122/13, ECLI:EU:T:2014:863
Bailii
Cited by:
See Also – Laboratoires Polive v OHMIi – Arbora and Ausonia (Dodie) ECFI 8-Oct-2014
ECFI (Judgment) Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark DODIE – Earlier national word mark DODOT – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537452

ECJ (Judgment) REACH – Fee for registration of a substance – Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises – Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise – Decision imposing an administrative charge – Proportionality

T-177/12, [2014] EUECJ T-177/12
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.537314

ECJ The admissibility of an action for failure to act based on the first paragraph of article 35 is subject in the first place to a finding that the high authority had, under a provision of the treaty or of rules laid down for the implementation thereof, a duty to take a decision or make a recommendation.
The court must of its own motion consider whether the provisions governing the form of applications have been complied with since those provisions affect not only the interests of the parties but also the right of the court to exercise its power of judicial review.
The words ‘brief statement of the grounds’ used in the protocol on the statute of the court of justice and the rules of procedure mean that, although the application need not conform with the phraseology of the first paragraph of article 33, it must specify the nature of the grounds on which the application is based. Although a mere abstract statement of the grounds in the application does not alone satisfy this requirement, the grounds may be expressed in terms of their substance rather than of their legal classification provided that the ground of complaint relied upon is established in relation to the facts which have been set out.
When brought as an alternative to an application for annulment, an application for damages under article 40 of the ecsc treaty is admissible only if it is based on grounds which are independent of those of the application for annulment.

C-19/60, [1961] EUECJ C-19/60
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 22 December 2021; Ref: scu.131635

ECJ Judgment – Civil service – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Travel expenses – Secondment of the applicant in a country of which he is a national – Condition set out in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations

S. Van Raepenbusch, P
F-91/13, [2014] EUECJ F-91/13
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537231

ECFI Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 8, 12 and 15 – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Proceedings relating to the custody of a child habitually resident in the Member State of residence of his mother – Prorogation of jurisdiction in favour of a court of the Member State of residence of the father – Scope

R. Silva de Lapuerta, P
C-436/13, [2014] EUECJ C-436/13
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537232

ECFI Judgment – Social policy – Community action programs in the field of youth – Partial repayment of the funding provided – Ineligibility of certain amounts – Exceeding the ceiling for a class of shares – Implementation by national agencies Recovery Procedures sums improperly used at the final beneficiary

MM. G. Berardis (Rapporteur), P
T-256/13, [2014] EUECJ T-256/13
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537233

ECFI Order – Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Dismissal of the appeal in the first instance as manifestly inadmissible – Lack of identity between the application lodged by fax and subsequently filed the original appeal -Delay – Lateness – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded ‘

T-699/13, [2014] EUECJ T-699/13 – CO
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537223

ECFI Judgment – Action for annulment – State aid – Online Games – Introduction to Denmark lower taxes for online games for casinos and gaming rooms – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid to facilitate the development of certain activities – No individual concern – Regulatory Act with enforcement action – Inadmissible

T-615/11, [2014] EUECJ T-615/11
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537224

ECJ Judgment – Civil service – Remuneration – EEAS staff serving in a third country – Decision of the appointing authority to amend the list of third countries where living conditions are equivalent to those usual in the EU – Measure of general application – Admissibility of – Annual assessment of the allowance for living conditions – Removed

S. Van Raepenbusch (Rapporteur), P
F-101/13, [2014] EUECJ F-101/13, ECLI: EU F: 2014: 223
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537064

ECFI Judgment – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Trading Scheme gas emissions greenhouse – Transitional rules regarding harmonized allocation of emission allowances for free in 2013 – Decision 2011/278/EU – National implementation measures by Germany – Clause on cases with undue hardship – Professional Freedom and Enterprise – Right to property – Proportionality

A. Dittrich (Rapporteur), P
T-629/13, [2014] EUECJ T-629/13
Bailii
Directive 2003/87/EC

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537063

ECFI Judgment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document issued by Germany as part of an EU Pilot procedure – Article 4, paragraphs 4 and 5 – Article 4, paragraph 2, third indent – Refusal access – Breach of essential procedural requirements – Duty to carry out a concrete, individual examination – Partial access – Overriding public interest

D. Gratsias, P
T-669/11, [2014] EUECJ T-669/11, ECLI: EU: T 2014: 814
Bailii
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537069

ECFI Judgment – Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of non-scheduled air transport of passengers and charter air taxi – Rejection of application – Article 94 b) of the Financial Regulation – Rights of the defense – Article 134, paragraph 5, of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation – Action for annulment – Letter responding to a request of the applicants – Act not amenable to review – Award Decision – No direct concern – Inadmissibility – Non-contractual liability

M me ME Martins Ribeiro, P
T-91/12, [2014] EUECJ T-91/12
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537058

ECFI Judgment – Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Renovation of a website – Rejection of a tenderer’s tender – Award of contract to another tenderer – Action for annulment – Obligation to state reasons – Award criteria – Manifest errors of assessment – Claim for damages

M.E. Martins Ribeiro (Rapporteur), P
T-498/11, [2014] EUECJ T-498/11
Bailii
European

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537057

ECFI Judgment – Appeal – Staff case – Temporary staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Conditions laid down in Article 4, paragraph 1 b) of Annex VII – Period decadal reference – Functions in an international organization

MM. M. Jaeger, P
T-86/13, [2014] EUECJ T-86/13, ECLI: EU: T: 2014 815
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537060

ECFI Judgment – Actions for annulment – State aid – Online gaming – Introduction in Denmark of lower taxes for online gaming than for casinos and amusement arcades – Decision declaring aid compatible with the internal market – Aid to facilitate the development of certain activities – Lack of individual concern – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Inadmissibility

A. Dittrich (Rapporteur), P
T-601/11, [2014] EUECJ T-601/11
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537055

EUCST Judgment – Civil service – Remuneration – Staff of the EEAS assigned to a third country – Decision of the appointing authority amending the list of third countries in respect of which the living conditions are equivalent to those normally obtaining in the European Union – Measure of general application – Admissibility of the action – Annual assessment of the allowance for living conditions – Abolition)

F-100/13, [2014] EUECJ F-100/13, ECLI:EU:F:2014:224
Bailii

European

Updated: 21 December 2021; Ref: scu.537061