Broxburn Bottlers Ltd v Revenue and Customs: Excs 5 Jul 2007

Approved Warehouse; failure to comply with conditions imposed by HMRC; Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 sections 92 and 93; The Excise Warehousing (Etc.) Regulations 1988, regulation 7; Notice 197; Notice 50.

Citations:

[2007] UKVAT-Excise E01049

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272128

Howells v Revenue and Customs: Excs 31 Jul 2007

EXCISE – Restoration of vehicle – Owner not present at time of seizure – No direct knowledge of driver’s action in attempting to avoid duty on seized goods – Owner and driver in long-term relationship – Whether genuine third-party situation – Whether importation commercial – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2007] UKVAT-Excise E01057

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272132

Gokce v Revenue and Customs: Excs 24 Apr 2008

Importation of obscene material – non-restoration of a motor vehicle – no evidence of exceptional hardship – non-restoration decision reasonable – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2008] UKVAT-Excise E01108

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Customs and Excise Management Act 1979

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272184

Belkiss v Revenue and Customs: Excs 30 May 2008

EXCS EXCISE DUTY – Restoration appeal – restoration of excise goods seized – Appellant’s case was that they were imported for his own use – Decision that it would not be an abuse of this Tribunal’s process to consider this issue notwithstanding the Appellant’s indication to the Commissioners that he did not wish to contest the legality of the seizure in the Magistrates’ Court – Decision on the facts that the Customs officers’ decision not to restore the goods on the grounds that they were imported for commercial purposes was not unreasonable – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2008] UKVAT-Excise E01117

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272188

Peet v Revenue and Customs: Excs 14 May 2008

EXCISE DUTY – restoration of goods – cigarettes and tobacco – appeal against re-review ordered by previous tribunal – ‘guideline’ amounts not exceeded – some of the goods intended to be provided on a non-profit basis to others – on re-review part of the goods was to be restored – re-review decision reasonable – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2008] UKVAT-Excise E01111

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272192

Dodge v Revenue and Customs: Excs 20 Jun 2008

EXCS EXCISE DUTY – Non-restoration of cigarettes and hand-rolling tobacco -Tribunal admitted evidence of personal use – no abuse of process – Review Officer refused restoration because the excise goods were intended for onward sale at profit – Review Officer’s decision reasonable – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2008] UKVAT-Excise E01120

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272196

Garrett Trading Ltd v Revenue and Customs: Excs 22 Aug 2007

EXCISE DUTY – goods removed from warehouse – duty suspended movement guaranteed by the Appellant – liable under the guarantee – Appellant not causing the occurrence of an excise duty point
VAT – removal of goods from fiscal warehousing regime

Citations:

[2007] UKVAT-Excise E01061

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise, VAT

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272135

Broadman v Revenue and Customs: Excs 22 Feb 2008

Excise Duty – Importation of tobacco and alcohol for ‘a commercial purpose’ – Seizure of Audi A4 – Whether the goods acquired that were not for own use or to be given away were only to be transferred to others for reimbursement of cost – Appeal dismissed – Right to request a re-hearing at which the Appellant would be present in person to give evidence and the circumstances where the Tribunal might agree and order that such a re-hearing be allowed

Citations:

[2008] UKVAT-Excise E01088

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272165

Koluch v Revenue and Customs: Excs 26 Jun 2008

EXCS EXCISE DUTY – NON RESTORATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE – The Appellant was the owner of the vehicle – not present at the seizure – the vehicle was used for smuggling excise goods – Appellant did not take reasonable steps to prevent the vehicle from being used for smuggling – evidence indicated that the Appellant knew about the smuggling attempt – non-restoration of vehicle proportionate – no exceptional hardship – review decision reasonable – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2008] UKVAT-Excise E01122

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272199

Evitt v Revenue and Customs: Excs 1 Apr 2008

EXCISE DUTY – BETTING AND GAMING DUTY – Amusement machine licence – Appellant provided a gaming machine for play without a licence – civil penalty – no reasonable excuse – assessment for arrears of duty confirmed – Appeal dismissed.

Citations:

[2008] UKVAT-Excise E01103

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272183

Roberts v Revenue and Customs: Excs 1 Dec 2005

EXCISE DUTY – HYDROCARBON OIL – CIVIL PENALTY – use of red diesel in road vehicle – Appellant failed to check the contents of the container before fuelling his vehicle – knew that the containers may contain red diesel – Appellant made stupid mistake – no reasonable excuse – appeal dismissed – sections 9 and 10 Finance Act 1994

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00928

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272013

F Loendersloot Internationale Expeditie Nv v Revenue and Customs: Excs 24 Mar 2006

Excs EXCISE – Duty suspended movement – Assessment on consignor – Theft during transit following release from detention – Guarantee provided by warehousekeeper of dispatch which was consignor – Release after journey time on AAD – Whether Appellant still guarantor – Appellant not notified of release – Compatibility of DSMEG Regs 2000 reg 7(1) with Excise Directive 92/12/EEC Arts 15.3 and 20.1 – Powers of Tribunal under FA 1944 s.16(5) – Appeal dismissed

Judges:

Theodore Wallace

Citations:

[2006] UKVAT-Excise E00948

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272024

Archibald v Revenue and Customs: Excs 18 Jul 2007

Excs Excise Duties – Non restoration of seized goods – whether Appellant’s letter was notice that he claimed the goods were not liable to seizure : para 3 sch 3 CEMA 1979 – held yes – whether question of own use open to the Tribunal – held yes – whether goods were for own use – held no – whether Customs’ decision reasonable : section 16(4) FA 1994 held yes

Citations:

[2007] UKVAT-Excise E01054

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272127

Dawkin v Revenue and Customs: VDT 2 Apr 2007

VDT EXCISE GOODS – Procedure – Appellant appealed against both seizure and restoration – Review decision on restoration made before appeal against seizure withdrawn – Whether Appellant able to contest facts relating to seizure before Tribunal – Weller considered.
RESTORATION – Reviewing office proceeded on basis Appellant would not have succeeded in Magistrates Court – Whether decision reasonable – Appeal allowed

Citations:

[2007] UKVAT-Excise E01036

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromHM Revenue and Customs v Dawkin ChD 2008
David Richards J reviewed the authorities and stated the test which has been applied in the tribunals and courts since Gascoyne: ‘The issue is whether the Tribunal misdirected itself in its consideration of the question of abuse of process. The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272116

Edit v Revenue and Customs: Excs 11 Aug 2006

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Decision not to restore seized motor vehicle – Appeal heard in the absence of the Appellant – Issue as to whether the Appellant owned the vehicle at the time of seizure – Whether Commissioners’ decision that she did not was unreasonable – Held it was not unreasonable – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2006] UKVAT-Excise E00977

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272061

Cleanaco Ltd v Revenue and Customs: Excs 11 Jan 2007

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Duty suspension – Diversion of spirits on dispatch from authorised warehouse – Liability of owner – False AADs prepared on instructions of owner’s employees without directors’ knowledge – Whether irregularity caused by Appellant – Notice under DSMEG Regs 2001 (S.I.2001/3022) reg 7(2) – Whether prior excise duty point under REDS Regs 1992 (S.I. 1992/3135) reg 4(2)(a) – Validity of assessment under FA 1994 s.12(1A) – Greenalls Management [2005] 1 WLR 1754, HL considered – Excise Directive (EEC/92/12) Art 20 – Assessment to VAT under VATA 1994 s.73(7B) – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2007] UKVAT-Excise E01012

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272088

Dalziel v Revenue and Customs: Excs 5 Jul 2006

Excs EXCISE DUTY RESTORATION OF GOODS – other – condemnation proceedings before magistrates concluding that cigarettes properly forfeited as held for commercial purpose – allegations before tribunal of falsehood, gross exaggeration and lack of independence on part of reviewing officer – allegations held to be without foundation – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2006] UKVAT-Excise E00967

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272049

Afton Chemicals Ltd v Revenue and Customs: Excs 4 May 2007

Excise Duty – Whether additives to motor fuel produced from ‘mineral products’ are subject to Excise Duty, as motor fuel, under the 1992 and 2003 Community Directives – whether such additives could be taxed under the UK domestic legislation if the 2003 Directive itself did not require imposition of Excise Duty – whether we should refer any of the points in dispute to the European Court of Justice for guidance or whether we should reach our own decisions on any or all of the points in contention – Appeal Dismissed

Citations:

[2007] UKVAT-Excise E01041

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedAfton Chemical v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Taxation) ECJ 18-Dec-2008
CJEU Directive 92/81/EEC Excise duty on mineral oils Article 2(2) and (3) and Article 8(1)(a) Directive 2003/96/EC Taxation of energy products and electricity Article 2(2), (3) and (4)(b) Scope Fuel additives . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Customs and Excise, European

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272118

Galbraith v Revenue and Customs: Excs 27 Sep 2006

Excs Restoration of vehicle seized by Customs sought – order in condemnation proceedings declared forfeit goods (25kgs. hand rolling tobacco and 600 cigarettes) and seized vehicle in which they were carried – vehicle used for part-time taxi business – exceptional hardship and proportionality considered – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2006] UKVAT-Excise E00993

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272066

Status Supplies (T/A Olton International) v Revenue and Customs: Excs 12 Sep 2006

Excs EXCISE TRANSIT PROCEDURE – revocation of excise duty guarantee given by transporter under CEMA 1979 s 157 – AADs not accompanying consignments from UK to France under duty suspension – transporter purporting to create substitute AAD – excise goods consigned to France diverted to West Midlands – AAD purporting to show receipt of goods in France not proved – observations on reasonableness of revocation – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2006] UKVAT-Excise E00990

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272069

Stanton Shipping and Trading Ltd v Revenue and Customs: Excs 3 Oct 2006

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Assessments on Appellant warehouse keeper made under s. 12 FA 1994 following irregular departures from suspension arrangements – art. 6 Excise Directive 92/12/EEC; regs. 4(2) and 5(4) Excise Goods (Holding, Movement and REDS) Regulations SI 1992/3135 – whether unlawful conduct of the Commissioners causative of the irregular departures – held not — whether Appellant properly liable – held yes – no Community law principle required the assessments to be quashed – Greenalls Management Limited v Commissioners of Customs and Excise [2005] UKHL 34 followed – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2006] UKVAT-Excise E00995

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272078

Smith v Revenue and Customs: Excs 20 Sep 2006

Excise Duties – Non-restoration of seized goods – cigarettes imported by regular traveller – Appellant ‘withdrawing’ notice to commence condemnation proceedings: whether possible – Appellant misled by Customs’ letter: whether legality of forfeiture and own use open for consideration by tribunal – reasonableness of decision on review – powers of tribunal under Section 16(4) FA 94

Citations:

[2006] UKVAT-Excise E00991

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272068

Shanley v Revenue and Customs: VDT 26 Jul 2005

EXCISE DUTIES – traveller importing 42 kg of tobacco – goods and car seized – claim that 6 kg intended as gift to father and 18 kg each to be given to agents who had secured large commissions – explanation implausible – refusal to restore car – hardship claimed – no exceptional circumstances – refusal to restore reasonable – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00897

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271978

Keown Midlands Ltd v Revenue and Customs: Excs 8 Dec 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTY – restoration of trailer – Appellant no involvement and no responsibility for unlawful importation of alcohol – Appellant’s previous offence not relevant to circumstances of the appeal – Respondents failed to apply their mind to the individual circumstances and the issue of proportionality – was the decision not to restore the seized trailer reasonable – no – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00932

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272011

Powell v Revenue and Customs: Excs 18 Aug 2005

Excs EXCISE – RESTORATION – Jurisdiction – Whether Tribunal can entertain appeal against review decision directed by Tribunal under FA 1994 s.16(4)(b) – Whether appellant ‘required the review’ within s.16(2) – No – Whether exclusion compatible with Human Rights Convention – No – Held necessary to read in words under HRA 1998, s.3 – Alternatively exclusion incompatible with Community Law
Jurisdiction – Goods disposed of before original decision under CEMA 1979 s.152(b) to refuse restoration – Whether section 152(b) includes power to make payment when restoration in kind not possible – Yes – Power either implied or read in under HRA s.3 – Not covered by CEMA s.6(2) – Tribunal therefore has jurisdiction
Jurisdiction – Payment when restoration not possible – Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction as to amount – Meaning of ‘restored’ in s.152(b) – Yes by implication or under HRA s.3

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00900

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271982

Cowie (T/A Cowie Transport) v Revenue and Customs: Excs 21 Dec 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTY – restoration of four vehicles subject to payment of restoration fee – review officer restricted her review to validating the fee against the amounts detailed in the relevant policy – review officer did not address Appellant’s blameworthiness and displayed a limited understanding of proportionality – review officer considered that the elements of the restoration fee were fixed and could not be altered by her – the proportionality of the Respondents’ policy open to question – was the decision to restore the four vehicles subject to payment of fee reasonable – no – appeal allowed and further review directed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00937

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272006

Lacey v Revenue and Customs: Excs 27 Oct 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTY – restoration of excise goods and motor vehicle – strong circumstantial case to support a finding of commercial importation – Appellant stated his job was in jeopardy because he could not get to work on time without his vehicle – Appellant failed to explain the position regarding the other vehicle registered in his name – no exceptional hardship – the offer of restoration of the vehicle on payment of a fee was proportionate – review decision reasonable – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00923

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272000

Daly v Revenue and Customs: Excs 8 Dec 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Restoration of seized excise goods and Ford transit van–large quantity of hand rolling tobacco imported – contradictory accounts of the Appellant and his brother about the funding arrangements for the purchase of tobacco – Respondents correct in giving weight to these facts – tribunal’s findings of fact support the Respondents conclusion that tobacco imported for commercial purpose – was the non-restoration of transit van proportionate to the Appellant’s contravention – yes – did the non-restoration create exceptional hardship – no – was the decision not to restore the excise goods and the Ford transit van reasonable – yes – Appeal dismissed.

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00930

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272008

Smith v Revenue and Customs: Excs 12 Jul 2005

EXCISE – Restoration – Application by Customs to dismiss appeal as abuse of process – Deemed forfeiture of 5000 cigarettes – Appellant claiming cigarettes for own use – Notice 12A (October 2002) – Appellant sent Letters A and B both appealing against seizure and requesting restoration – Customs’ letter stating restoration could not be considered until condemnation determined – Appeal against seizure withdrawn – Application under Rule 6 that restoration appeal asserting own use could not be entertained – Whether Tribunal has power to dismiss appeal on such application – Held that no power – Finding that not abuse of process because Appellant misled – Finance Act 1994 s.16 – Trib Rules 1986 r.6(1), 18(1) – Customs application dismissed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00896

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271980

Rodovasco Transportes E Terraplanagens v Revenue and Customs: Excs 31 Oct 2005

Excs EXCISE – Restoration refusal – Overseas Haulier carrying beer with no evidence that duty paid and inadequate documentation – Appellant did not attend – Hearing in absence – No checks made by Appellant as to load – Excise duty andpound;7,792 – Value of vehicle and trailer andpound;10,700 – Refusal not disproportionate – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00925

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.272003

McKarnon v Revenue and Customs: Excs 30 Sep 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTIES – interception of vehicle – driven by Appellant’s husband vehicle found to contain 80,000 cigarettes in respect of which duty had not been paid – seizure of vehicle – request by Appellant for restoration – application of restoration policy – whether Appellant sole owner of vehicle – whether vehicle jointly owned – Appellant without involvement in any offence – Appellant an innocent party – Whether reasonable not to restore vehicle – Whether decision not to restore based upon correct findings as to ownership of the vehicle – Appeal allowed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00919

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271995

Kimpton and Another (T/A P and H Kimpton Transport) v Customs and Excise: Excs 13 Dec 2004

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Restoration of Tractor unit used for transporting large quantities of vodka – whether appellant had taken all reasonable steps to prevent diversion – finding that Appellant had acted with lack of care – appeal dismissed.

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00836

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271913

Ali v Revenue and Customs: Excs 24 May 2005

EXCISE DUTY – beer seized at Coquelles – joint trip – Appellant claiming restoration of his share – claimed intended for brother’s wedding – discrepancies in evidence – decision of Customs reasonably arrived at – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00885

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271957

Bell v Revenue and Customs: Excs 26 Jul 2005

VDT RESTORATION – third trip abroad – stopped at Dover Eastern Docks – goods within the guidelines – purchased for the Appellant and his family – Appellant seriously depressed after death of father – encouraged to go abroad to buy the goods by aunt – refusal to restore cigarettes and spirits reasonable – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00898, [2005] UKVAT-Excise E00898 – 1

Links:

Bailii, Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271969

Wellings v Customs and Excise: Excs 13 Apr 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTIES – Seizure of car and goods at Coquelles – no condemnation proceedings and goods and car deemed to be forfeit – whether issue of importation of goods for own use can be raised by Appellant before tribunal – yes – whether decision on review to refuse restoration reasonable – no – case remitted by tribunal for further review – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00876

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271956

Atkinson v Customs and Excise: Excs 22 Feb 2005

EXCISE DUTIES – travellers importing excise goods from France and Belgium without payment of UK duty – goods and vehicle seized and not restored – parties coming to agreement at conclusion of hearing – further review directed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00849

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271920

Duell v Customs and Excise: Excs 17 Feb 2005

RESTORATION – Seizure of excise goods and vehicle – Large quantity of goods – Restoration sought on ground of exceptional hardship – Evidence of inconvenience and hardship resulting from seizure of vehicle – Whether hardship exceptional – No – Appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00850

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271924

Butters v Revenue and Customs: Excs 6 Jun 2005

EXCS EXCISE DUTIES – Seizure of excise goods at Hull ferry port – no condemnation proceedings and goods deemed to be forfeit – whether issue of importation of goods for own use can be raised by Appellant before tribunal – yes – whether decision on review to refuse restoration reasonable – no – case remitted by tribunal for further review – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00888

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271964

Osbourne v Customs and Excise: Excs 3 Nov 2004

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Seizure of Vehicle and Goods – Reasonableness of Commissioners’ Decision to refuse restoration – was the importation commercial and for profit – yes in part – application of Commissioners’ policy – Appeal allowed in respect of the vehicle.

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00815

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271902

Brookes v Customs and Excise: Excs 22 Feb 2005

EXCISE DUTY – Restoration of a motor vehicle and excise goods – father importing cigarettes and beer – son importing tobacco and beer – father’s importation was for personal use – son’s importation commercial use for profit – material difference from the Review Officers’ finding that both were involved in commercial importation – whether this difference may have a bearing upon the decision not to restore – yes – was the decision not to restore the vehicle reasonable – no – Appeal allowed.

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00847

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271921

Singh v Customs and Excise: Excs 16 Aug 2004

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Restoration of seized excise goods and motor vehicle – Tribunal finds that the Appellant purchased the goods for use by family – the non restoration of the motor vehicle was disproportionate and caused exceptional hardship – Review Officer failed to apply the facts to the Respondents’ policies on restoration and the 2002 Regulations – Review Officer wrongly restricted consideration of the restoration of the motor vehicle to the question of legal ownership – decision not to restore unreasonable – appeal allowed – further review ordered

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00782

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271861

Spencer v Customs and Excise: Excs 16 Aug 2004

Excs RESTORATION – worked in Paris installing electronic tills for Marks and Spencer’s – on returning home decided to buy gifts for workforce – purchased 30 kg hand rolling tobacco; 3,456 cigarettes; 69.76 litres of beer; 46.75 litres of wine and 12 litres of cider – refusal to restore the excise goods and vehicle unreasonable – appeal allowed

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00777

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271862

Elliott v Customs and Excise: Excs 7 Feb 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Restoration of Porshe Boxster motor vehicle– whether the 24kg of hand rolling tobacco was for personal or commercial use – commercial use for profit – was the non-restoration proportionate to the Appellant’s contravention – yes – did the non-restoration of the vehicle create exceptional hardship – no – was the decision not to restore the vehicle reasonable – yes – Appeal dismissed.

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00843

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271925

McCullim and others v Customs and Excise: Excs 7 Feb 2005

Excs EXCISE DUTY – refusal to restore excise goods including 18 kilograms of hand rolling tobacco and 24,860 cigarettes imported by the three Appellants – the Appellants claimed that the goods were not liable to forfeiture and proceedings were commenced in the magistrates court – those proceedings had not been heard at the date of the hearing of these appeals – whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to decide whether the goods were held for the personal use of the Appellants – in these appeals no – whether if the tribunal had that jurisdiction the goods were held for the personal use of the Appellants – no – whether the disputed decision was a reasonable decision – yes – appeals dismissed – Council Directive (EEC) No 92/12 Arts 7 to 9; The Excise Goods, Beer and Tobacco Products (Amendment) Regulations 2002 SI 2002 No. 2691; Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 S 152(b); Finance Act 1994 Ss 14 to 16

Judges:

Brice Ch

Citations:

[2005] UKVAT-Excise E00845

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271932

McNally and McNally v Customs and Excise: Excs 10 May 2004

EXCISE DUTIES – appellants intercepted carrying goods within minimum indicative limits – history of recent trip – aggregate quantities brought into country substantial – whether review officer’s conclusion that importations commercial reasonable – yes – whether grounds for restoration – no – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00712

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271804

Boardman and Another v Customs and Excise: Excs 23 Apr 2004

Excs EXCISE DUTY – Restoration of seized motor vehicle – the cigarettes and tobacco were sold for a profit – the non-restoration was proportionate to the contravention – no exceptional hardship – no third party owner – no reasons given for the deemed decision – outcome of a further review inevitably the same – non-restoration decision reasonable – Appeal dismissed.

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00705

Links:

Bailii

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271768

McCullim and others v Customs and Excise: Excs 4 May 2004

EXCISE DUTY RESTORATION OF GOODS – Jurisdiction – Application by Customs to stand over restoration appeals pending condemnation proceedings – Condemnation proceedings brought forward – Short stand over directed

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00717

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271803

Watkinson v Customs and Excise: Excs 4 Jun 2004

excs EXCISE DUTY – importation of 34.5kg hand rolling tobacco and 8400 cigarettes by 2 men travelling in vehicle – forfeiture of vehicle and goods – vehicle owned by their sister’s partner – claim for restoration of vehicle by owner – whether review decision to offer conditional restoration of vehicle for a fee of andpound;1450 was reasonable – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00740

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271829

Tanner v Customs and Excise: Excs 26 Mar 2004

RESTORATION – Goods only seized – Goods alleged to have been hidden in van – Customs evidence confused and contradictory – Whether review decision based thereon reasonable – No – Further review directed

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00684, [2004] UKVAT-Excise E000684

Links:

Bailii, Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoTanner v Customs and Excise Excs 20-Feb-2003
EXCISE DUTY – Appeal heard in the absence of the Appellant under VAT Tribunals Rules, Rule 26(2) – Appeal under s.16 FA 1994 against a review decision not to offer seized excise goods for restoration – imported excise goods allegedly concealed in a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271758

Williams v Customs and Excise: Excs 4 May 2004

RESTORATION – Appellant imported 10kg tobacco and 6,200 cigarettes – Appellant stated that foods were intended as gifts to family who had been generous to him when he was bankrupt – Goods paid for out of money recently inherited – Commissioners decided goods imported for sale at profit because (inter alia) expenditure not commensurate with income – Whether decision reasonable – No – Appeal allowed: further review ordered
RESTORATION APPEAL – Whether appellant may adduce evidence as to whether goods imported for own use – Whether Tribunal may find such facts – Effect of decision of CA in Gora v Customs and Excise Commissioners

Citations:

[2004] UKVAT-Excise E00715

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271817