S and I Electronics Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 19 Apr 2016

FTTTx (Procedure : Other) VAT – PROCEDURE – Costs – transitional rules in SI2009/56 for ‘current proceedings’ – appeal heard over 17 days before 1 April 2009, decision released awarding costs – then remitted by Upper Tribunal and 2 further days’ hearing in 2012 – whether old cost Rules should apply to the 2 day hearing. Application refused.

[2016] UKFTT 260 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.562874

Ready and Another (T/A The Open Kitchen Cafe) v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Penalties : Late Registration): FTTTx 18 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – VAT Assessment in default of returns by taxpayer partnership which had traded above VAT registration threshold – retrospective registration – VATA 1994 Schedule 1 paragraphs 1 and 3 – penalty for late registration – s 70 VATA 1994 – whether reliance on advice of accountant a reasonable excuse – no – whether assessment exceeded best judgement calculation – yes – appeal allowed in part

[2016] UKFTT 255 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.562871

Kingsdale Group Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Penalties : Default Surcharge): FTTTx 11 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – default surcharge – late payments – whether reasonable excuse – no – return for 03/13 submitted one day late – whether proportionate – yes – surcharges calculated by reference to VAT on what were later ruled to be exempt supplies – was tax on those exempt supplies outstanding VAT – no – proportionality – was it disproportionate for the respondents to apply the surcharge percentage to the VAT on exempt supplies – yes – impact of appellants being unable to make a valid section 80 claim – none – appeal allowed in part.

[2016] UKFTT 236 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.562862

Boxmoor Construction Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 22 Feb 2016

UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – zero rating – Item 2 and Notes 16 and 18 Group 5 Schedule 8 VAT Act 1994 – supplies in course of construction following demolition of building except for part of facade – whether retention of facade condition of planning consent or similar permission – no – whether part of facade retained disregarded as de minimis – no – whether works reconstruction, alteration, enlargement and extension to existing building – yes – appeal dismissed

[2016] UKUT 91 (TCC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.562419

E Buyer UK Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 10 Mar 2016

UTTC PROCEDURE – MTIC appeals – allegations of knowledge that appellant’s transactions orchestrated and contrived and formed part of an overall scheme to defraud the Revenue – whether HMRC’s statement of case alleged dishonesty and therefore whether sufficiently particularised – whether standard disclosure of relevant documents appropriate

[2016] UKUT 123 (TCC)
Bailii
England and Wales

Taxes Management, VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.562430

G Wilson (Glaziers) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 Nov 2011

VAT default surcharge – five defaults recorded and three surcharges levied – whether a Time to Pay arrangement existed – on the evidence, no – whether genuine belief that had a Time to Pay arrangement – yes – whether this amounted to a reasonable excuse – yes for three of the five periods – whether it was fair and just not to adjourn the appeal to hear further evidence – yes – appeal allowed in part

[2011] UKFTT 731 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.449654

Bunning (T/A Stafford Land Rover) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Jan 2012

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – zero-rating of the supply of a qualifying motor vehicle to a handicapped person who usually uses a wheelchair – item 2A, Group 12, Schedule 8, VATA – notes (3) and (5L) of Group 12 considered – whether two vehicles supplied were each (a) supplied to a handicapped person who usually uses a wheelchair, and (b) a qualifying motor vehicle – held in both cases both conditions were fulfilled and the supplies fell to be zero-rated – appeal allowed

[2012] UKFTT 32 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.450785

Firstpoint (Europe) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Nov 2011

VAT: Place of Supply; Council Directive 2008/8/EC, Article 46 supplies to non-taxable persons, Value Added Tax Act (VATA) 1994, Schedule 4 Part 3 paragraph 10(1) and (2) exceptions relating to supplies not made to relevant business person, Intermediaries: intention to facilitate the making of supplies of sports scholarships by US academic institutions; whether place of supply is US or UK. Appeal Allowed.

[2011] UKFTT 708 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.449653

Bromley Emergency Training and Development Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 Jan 2012

VAT – Registration – Supply of services – Training courses – Advance payments – Threshold for registration – Whether time of supply rules apply when deciding when threshold exceeded – Yes – VATA 1994 s.6.4, Sch 1 para 1 – Appeal dismissed

[2012] UKFTT 30 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.450784

Jones v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Aug 2012

VAT – DIY Housebuilders Scheme – barn conversion with adjacent office – conditions for refund – planning consent – whether use or disposal restricted by s106 agreement – appeal allowed

[2012] UKFTT 499 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 13 January 2022; Ref: scu.466107

Degano Trasporti Sas di Ferruccio Degano and Co, in liquidation, intervening party: Pubblico Ministero presso il Tribunale di Udine: ECJ 7 Apr 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – VAT – Article 4(3) TEU – Directive 2006/112/EC – Insolvency – Procedure for an arrangement with creditors – Partial payment of VAT debts

C-546/14, [2016] EUECJ C-546/14
Bailii
Directive 2006/112/EC
European

VAT

Updated: 13 January 2022; Ref: scu.561979

Clarke and Another v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Penalties : Reasonable Excuse): FTTTx 1 Apr 2016

FTTTx Value Added Tax – Default Surcharges for late submission of Returns and payments – periods extending from 12/07 to 09/12 – whether reasonable excuse or mitigation appropriate- No – Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Surcharges totalling andpound;14,801 confirmed – appeal dismissed.

[2016] UKFTT 227 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 13 January 2022; Ref: scu.561936

SDI-Unistride (Southern) Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Penalties : Default Surcharge): FTTTx 1 Apr 2016

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – default surcharge – insufficiency of funds – whether exceptional underlying reasons for lack of funds – for one period, held no – for the subsequent period, particular circumstances leading to limited availability of funds – appeal dismissed in respect of first period, allowed in respect of second period

[2016] UKFTT 226 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 13 January 2022; Ref: scu.561937

Minister Finansow v Aspiro: ECJ 17 Mar 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 135(1)(a) – Exemption for insurance – Definition of ‘insurance’ transactions and of ‘related services performed by insurance brokers and insurance agents’ – Claims settlement services provided by and on behalf of an insurer

C-40/15, [2016] EUECJ C-40/15
Bailii

European, VAT

Updated: 13 January 2022; Ref: scu.561941

Andrew Ellis and Jane Bromley v Revenue and Customs (VAT: DIY New Build Claim for Repayment of Vat On Goods): FTTTx 21 Sep 2021

VAT: DIY New Build Claim for repayment of VAT on goods, whether s35 VATA permits more than one claim to be made by an individual during construction, yes, whether the regulations permit more than one claim, no, whether the regulations are ultra vires, yes, appeal allowed.

[2021] UKFTT 343 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 13 January 2022; Ref: scu.669737

Davis and Dann Ltd and Another v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 15 Mar 2016

The Revenue appealed from rejection of its refusal to refund input tax in the basis that the company though itself innocent of VAT fraud should have understood that the transaction was part of a MTIC fraud. The court was now asked whether the Upper Tribunal had erred in failing to consider the cumulative effect of the circumstances known to the trader, when overturning the FTT’s finding that the trader should have known that its transactions were connected with fraud.
Held: The reveue’s appeal succeeded. The court was not concerned with exploring the relevance of the ‘only reasonable explanation’ criterion. This was a high hurdle for the Revenue to establish.
Arden LJ said: ‘The UT directed itself that, if it considered that there was a reasonable explanation for concluding that the Transactions were unconnected with a fraud, it would in general be bound to conclude that the HMRC had not shown that the only reasonable explanation for the Transactions was that they were connected with fraud.’ and ‘in assessing whether the respondents’ knowledge met the no other reasonable explanation standard, the FTT still had to go on to consider all the circumstances. The question is whether or not a reasonable person mindful of those circumstances ought to have concluded that the Transactions were connected with fraud. What matters is the perspective of the person alleged to have such knowledge. A finding of knowledge to the no other reasonable explanation standard can accordingly be reached irrespective of whether the other parties to the Transactions were in fact fraudulent.’

Arden, Tomlinson, Lindblom LJJ
[2016] EWCA Civ 142, [2016] STC 1236, [2016] BVC 11, [2016] STI 1157
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
At FTTTxDavis and Dann Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 17-Jan-2012
FTTTx Value Added Tax – MTIC appeal involving purchases of razor blades by the Appellants in April and May 2006 – whether the Appellants should have known that their purchases were connected to the fraudulent . .
At UTTCDavis and Dann Ltd and Precis (1080) Ltd v HMRC UTTC 6-Aug-2013
UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – denial of repayment of input tax due to MTIC fraud – ‘grey market’ transaction in razor blades – nature of and terms on which transactions entered into – other parties to the transactions . .
CitedMobilx Ltd and Others v HM Revenue and Customs; Blue Sphere Global Ltd v Same and similar CA 12-May-2010
Each company sought repayment of input VAT. HMRC refused, saying that the transactions were the end-product of a fraud on it, and that even if the taxpayer did not know that a fraud was involved, it should have been aware that one was and acted . .

Cited by:
CitedAC (Wholesale) Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax) UTTC 12-May-2017
VALUE ADDED TAX – purchases of televisions – transactions connected to fraudulent loss of tax – whether taxable person should have known that its transactions were connected to fraud – whether HMRC required to prove that only reasonable explanation . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 12 January 2022; Ref: scu.561122

D’Agostino v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 27 Jan 2012

Notice of Requirement to give security; trader involved in similar failed businesses leaving tax substantial debts; trader’s poor compliance record; VATA 1994 Schedule 11, paragraph 4(2)(a); whether Respondents entitled to require the Appellant to give security;-Yes; Appeal dismissed

[2012] UKFTT 91 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 12 January 2022; Ref: scu.451932

Valantine v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 9 Dec 2011

FTTTx Income Tax – National Insurance Contributions – Value Added Tax – whether Mrs. Valantine was in partnership with her husband, and thus liable as partner for her share of the partnership income tax liabilities and for the whole of the VAT liability of the business, clearly conducted by her husband – Appeal allowed

[2011] UKFTT 808 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

Income Tax, VAT

Updated: 12 January 2022; Ref: scu.450964

Levi Solicitors Llp v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 10 Nov 2011

VAT default surcharge – request for a Time To Pay arrangement under S.108 Finance Act 2009 – arrangement agreed after protracted delay – dispute as to period(s) for which arrangement was to relate – whether arrangement included disputed period or operated retrospectively from date of request

[2011] UKFTT 727 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 12 January 2022; Ref: scu.449664

Aria Technology Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Repayments : Vat – Repayments): FTTTx 16 Feb 2016

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – denial of right to deduct on grounds that the Appellant knew or should have known that the transactions were part of fraud by others – alleged MTIC – whether shown that the Appellant’s transactions connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT – yes – whether Appellant knew or should have known of fraud – yes – valid refusal of right to deduct – assessment and jurisdiction of the FTT – appeal dismissed

[2016] UKFTT 98 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.560221

The Wellcome Trust Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 2 Feb 2016

(Vat – Input Tax : Other) VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax repayment claim – whether the effect of VNLTO is that the Appellant cannot rely on the Lennartz mechanism – whether capital assets allocated on acquisition to business and whether there was private use within Article 6(2) (a) Sixth Directive

[2016] UKFTT 56 (TC), [2016] SFTD 783, [2016] STI 553
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.559945

Ripon Farm Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 20 Jan 2016

Vat – Penalties : Default Surcharge – VAT default surcharge – whether reasonable excuse – insufficiency of funds – Steptoe considered – time to pay arrangement requested – whether request properly considered – no – whether reasonable excuse – yes – appeal allowed

[2016] UKFTT 39 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.559908

Silver Sea Properties (Leamington Spa) Sarl v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Opco/Propco Structure – Lease of ‘Turnkey’ Care Home): FTTTx 7 Sep 2021

Opco/Propco structure – lease of ‘turnkey’ care home – treatment of furniture, fixtures and equipment supplied by PropCo to OpCo – extent to which items are ‘incorporated’ or are ‘building materials’ for purposes of ‘builder’s block’ – whether single composite supply – zero rating – Article 6, Value Added Tax (Input Tax) Order 1992

[2021] UKFTT 350 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.669754

Duhra and Others (As Partners) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 May 2011

Income Tax – profits – taxi rental business – alleged under-declaration – discovery assessments – extended time assessments – whether method of calculation of turnover used by HMRC appropriate
Value Added Tax – alleged failure to register – alleged under-declaration of turnover – whether method adopted by HMRC appropriate

[2011] UKFTT 322 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

Income Tax, VAT

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.443032

JIB Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 Aug 2012

VAT – INPUT TAX – was professional independent trustee of pension schemes entitled to deduct VAT on services of third party advisers relating to schemes? – held yes – are amounts paid by schemes in relation to advisers’ services consideration for supplies of services by trustee? – held yes – do principles of legitimate expectation, fiscal neutrality and equal treatment lead to different result? – held no – appeal allowed

[2012] UKFTT 547 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.466106

Polo Farm Sports Club v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Whether Payment Was Consideration for The Grant of A Lease): FTTTx 4 Oct 2021

Whether payment was consideration for the grant of a lease – yes – whether agreement for lease, lease, counterpart lease and counterpart underlease fall to be treated as single transaction – Mydibel and Balhousie Holdings considered – yes – appeal dismissed

[2021] UKFTT 360 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.669773

Colaingrove Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 Jan 2013

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – supplies of holiday accommodation and power by the operator of a holiday camp to customers taking short term holidays in static caravans or chalets – different considerations charged for the accommodation and the power – the charge for the power did not relate to the power consumed by the customer concerned – whether there was a single supply of serviced holiday accommodation taxable at the standard rate or separate supplies of accommodation and power, the supply of power being taxable at the reduced rate – Section 29A and Group 1, Schedule 7A, VATA considered – held on the basis of European Commission v France (Case C-94/09) that the UK was entitled to legislate to provide for the reduced rate to apply to supplies of domestic fuel or power even in a case where such supplies formed merely an element in a large single complex supply which was not a supply of domestic fuel or power, provided the supply of domestic fuel or power was a concrete and specific aspect of the larger supply and such treatment did not infringe the principle of fiscal neutrality or distort competition – held further that section 29A and Group 1, Schedule 7A, VATA made such provision and that the supplies of power in the instant case were accordingly taxable at the reduced rate – held further that if that was wrong there was a single supply on the application of the Card Protection Plan jurisprudence (Case C-349/96)which was taxable at the standard rate – appeal allowed

[2013] UKFTT 116 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 January 2022; Ref: scu.472289

KDT Management Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 30 Dec 2015

FTTTx (VAT – Special Schemes : Other) VALUE ADDED TAX – Flat-rate scheme – assessment to recover VAT where trader does not implement increase in percentage – appellant claiming correct percentage for actual business used instead of incorrect percentage for business category applied for – whether s 84(4ZA) VATA (supervisory review) applies – no -assessment cancelled – decision not to allow appellant to retrospectively use percentage for actual business – HMRC decision held unreasonable – decision cancelled.

[2015] UKFTT 690 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 09 January 2022; Ref: scu.558265

Spa and Resort Operations Ltd v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs: VDT 17 Mar 2009

VDT VAT – output tax – face-value vouchers issued by appellant to guests at health and beauty treatment spas – assuming vouchers issued by appellant face-value vouchers whether supplied for consideration – no – alternatively whether vouchers discount vouchers – yes – appeal dismissed

[2009] UKVAT V20979
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 08 January 2022; Ref: scu.346559

U-Drive Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Tripartite Situation): FTTTX 10 Dec 2015

FTTTx VAT – tripartite situation – car hire company arranging for repair of third parties’ vehicles damaged in collisions with hired cars-whether car hire company entitled to recover VAT on car repair invoices – Baxi, Aimia and WHA applied – whether economic reality inconsistent with contractual position – yes – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 667 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 08 January 2022; Ref: scu.557194

Kelly (T/A Ludbrook Manor Partnership) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTX 3 Dec 2015

VAT – INPUT TAX – deduction denied on basis no supply – company formed by owners of property to undertake holiday lettings incurred costs on refurbishment – owners later formed partnership – recharge of refurbishment invoices by company to partnership did not constitute supply of services -knowledge or means of knowledge of fraud not necessary for input tax to be denied – input tax allowed on supply of goods (furniture and other items) from company to partnership – deliberate inaccuracy penalties cancelled – careless inaccuracy penalties upheld – appeal allowed in part

[2015] UKFTT 632 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 08 January 2022; Ref: scu.557180

National Car Parks Limited v Revenue and Customs: FTTTX 15 Dec 2015

FTTTX (Vat – Consideration : Other) VAT – car parking – whether overpayments consideration for taxable supply of services – link between consideration given and service received – HELD – sufficient link between consideration given and service received – overpayments subject to VAT – appeal dismissed.

[2015] UKFTT 666 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 08 January 2022; Ref: scu.557184

Marino v Revenue and Customs: FTTTX 3 Dec 2015

VAT – hearing in the absence of the appellant – default surcharge – late payment, lack of funds due to tenant’s late payment of rent – whether reasonable excuse – held, no reasonable excuse – whether surcharge correctly applied, yes – appeal dismissed

[2015] UKFTT 633 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 08 January 2022; Ref: scu.557183

G Robertson Consulting Ltd v Revenue and Customs (647): FTTTX 9 Dec 2015

VALUE ADDED TAX – registration – date when appellant first became liable to be registered – assessment for output tax and disallowed input tax – quantum of assessment – appeal dismissed in principle, save in respect of certain input tax credits and certain consequential matters

[2015] UKFTT 647 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 08 January 2022; Ref: scu.557174