Weissman And Others v Romania: ECHR 2 Dec 2011

The Court found violations of the Convention concerning lack of access to a court and the breach of the applicant’s rights to peaceful enjoyment of their possession (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) (see details in Appendix).
Held: Greater justification is required if fees are imposed at an initial stage of the proceedings.

Citations:

63945/00, [2011] ECHR 2204

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedUnison, Regina (on The Application of) v The Lord Chancellor and Another Admn 7-Feb-2014
The claimant challenged the Regulations and Orders charging for the laying of complaints at Employment Tribunals, saying they were mistaken and discriminatory.
Held: The challenge failed. The new Order was not in breach of European Union . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.460836

Veniosov v Ukraine: ECHR 15 Dec 2011

Citations:

30634/05, [2011] ECHR 2130

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedFaulkner, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another SC 1-May-2013
The applicants had each been given a life sentence, but having served the minimum term had been due to have the continued detention reviewed to establish whether or not continued detention was necessary for the protection of the pblic. It had not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.460827