EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – DEDUCED EFFECT
ET concluded that Sch 1 para 6 of DDA (Deduced Effect) did not apply where applicant had pins and plate inserted for ankle fracture in 1984 and no continuing treatment. Remitted to same Tribunal to consider (on further medical evidence if necessary) whether the pins/plate amounted to continuing measures.
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Burton (President)
Citations:
EATS/0081/04, [2005] UKEAT 0081 – 04 – 2504
Links:
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 11 July 2022; Ref: scu.257449