EAT AGE DISCRIMINATION
REDUNDANCY – Protective award
The Tribunal did not err in law in concluding that in the age discrimination claim the burden of proof passed to the Appellant nor that the Respondent had failed to discharge it.
In making a protective award, the Tribunal did not err in law in not including a discretionary bonus scheme as part of a week’s pay where the date for paying or considering whether to pay such a bonus had not yet occurred.
Citations:
[2010] UKEAT 0141 – 10 – 2408
Links:
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 22 August 2022; Ref: scu.421589