The intervener sought an order in its favour after its petition had been successful.
Held: The application failed. Such an application had to meet three conditions: 1) Success of the petition; 2) The intervention had made a real contribution, and 3) its contribution did not repeat the submissions of the principals. In this case the intervener met the first and third conditions but not the second.
John Baldwin QC
[2016] EWHC 1609 (Ch), [2016] WLR(D) 373
Bailii, WLRD
England and Wales
Intellectual Property, Costs
Updated: 01 November 2021; Ref: scu.566876