The plaintiff had carried on a business selling ‘Burgess’s Essence of Anchovies’. His son set up a business with a similar name and purpose.
Held: the court would not restrain the use of his own name by a person in trade, save only if an intention to defraud was shown.
Citations:
[1853] LR 14 CD 748, (1853) De G MandG 896, [1843-60] All Er Rep 90, [1853] 22 LJ Ch 675, [1853]
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – British Telecommunications Plc; Virgin Enterprises Ltd; J Sainsbury Plc; Marks and Spencer Plc and Ladbroke Group Plc v One In a Million Ltd and others CA 23-Jul-1998
Registration of a distinctive Internet domain name using registered trade marks and company names could be an infringement of a registered Trade Mark, and also passing off. It was proper to grant quia timet injunctions where necessary to stop . .
Cited – Spalding (A G ) and Brothers v A W Gamage Ltd HL 1915
The House considered the requirements for the tort of passing off. The judge has the sole responsibility for deciding whether anybody has been misled. He will hear evidence, but must not surrender his assessment to others.
Lord Parker said: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 05 December 2022; Ref: scu.239040