BUQ v HRE: QBD 7 May 2015

The claimant had employed the defendant, eventually dismissing him and obtaining orders to restrain disclosure of various private matters. After the Employment Tribunal dismissed the defendants clais, the claimant sought damages. The defendant alleged in answer that certain of the claims were false.
Held: The defence against the injunction was, in the light of the ET findings, hopeless. However certain elements could not be resolved without further investigation, and on the defendantcorrecting his pleadings might proceed to trial.

Judges:

Warby J

Citations:

[2015] EWHC 1272 (QB)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Torts – Other

Updated: 25 July 2022; Ref: scu.546417