British Steel Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 12 May 1999

Where oil had been burned in a process not for the purpose of creating heat but for some other function within a technical process, it was wrong to designate it as the burning of fuel, or as heating fuel. Where the effect produced heat as a secondary purpose it could be a taxable purpose, but where the heat was purely incidental it was not and hydrocarbon oil duty had been wrongly imposed.

Citations:

Times 12-May-1999

Statutes:

Hydrocarbon Oil Duty Act 1979 9

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Customs and Excise

Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.78633