Bird v University of Bristol (Practice and Procedure : Perversity): EAT 4 Apr 2013

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Perversity
The Claimant’s case was that he was offered work for a minimum 5 year period. The Tribunal rejected this case on the facts. It was argued that the Tribunal’s conclusion was perverse.
Held: it was not perverse. Yeboah v Crofton [2002] IRLR 634 applied.

David Richardson J
[2013] UKEAT 0469 – 12 – 0404
Bailii
England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 14 November 2021; Ref: scu.511051