Big City Leisure Ltd v McCarthy: EAT 31 Oct 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Amendment
The Employment Tribunal held that the Appellant company, the transferee following a service provision change, needed permission to amend its ET3 in order to challenge whether Claimant was an employee (as opposed to being self-employed) prior to the transfer, and refused permission – Held that no such permission was required – Issue of Claimant’s employment status remitted to the Tribunal for determination.

Judges:

Underhill P J

Citations:

[2012] UKEAT 0459 – 12 – 3110

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 12 November 2022; Ref: scu.467149