Bell of Blackwoodhouse v Gartshore: 1737

Alexander Oliphant bought a tenement in Kelso which was being sold by the adjudging creditors of William Chatto. Without becoming infeft, in 1730 Oliphant disponed the decree of sale to Chatto’s son, who also was not infeft. Two years later Chatto junior granted a heritable bond to Bell of Blackethouse who had paid two bills of exchange for him and was entitled to relief. Bell entered into possession but was not infeft. In 1734 John Gartshore, another creditor of Chatto junior, adjudged the decree of sale of the tenement from him and obtained a charter of resignation from the superior, the Duke of Roxburgh, on which he was infeft. A question arose as to the respective entitlements of Chatto junior’s two creditors, Bell and Gartshore.
Held: No conveyance of a personal right to lands can so divest the disponer as to prevent him from granting a posterior deed that may, by prior sasine, be made the preferable.

Citations:

1737 M 2848, 5 Br Suppl 198, 2 Ross’s LC 410

Jurisdiction:

Scotland

Cited by:

CitedBurnett’s Trustee v Grainger and Another HL 4-Mar-2004
A flat was sold, but before the purchasers registered the transfer, the seller was sequestrated, and his trustee registered his own interest as trustee. The buyer complained that the trustee was unjustly enriched.
Held: The Act defined the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land

Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.194226