EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
TRADE UNION RIGHTS
Where the ET relied, crucially on material in coming to its decision which did not form part of the explicitly pleaded case with which the appellant’s relevant witness had not been given the opportunity in evidence to deal, the conclusions of the ET could not stand and the matter had to be remitted to a different ET for these issues to be properly adjudicated upon.
Citations:
[2009] UKEAT 0402 – 08 – 2002
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Abbey National Plc v Bascetta EAT 5-Dec-2008
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Postponement or stay
Employment Tribunal refused to postpone remedy hearing until after appeals by both parties heard at full hearing by the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Material . .
Cited – British Aerospace plc v Green and Others CA 18-Apr-1995
The employer was to make 530 members of its staff redundant. Each staff member was assessed and scored. The claimants said that the method of selection was unfair, and sought disclosure of the scores of all employees.
Held: It was wrong to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.304522