EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
Dissatisfied with opinions under rules 3(7) and (8), and seeing no justice in the EAT, the Claimant, at times with legal help, chose to go to the Court of Appeal where a Deputy Master declined to hear him as he had not exhausted the process in the EAT by a rule 3(10) hearing. His by now out of time application to the EAT was refused as no good excuse had been given, even though exhaustion of process is not a requirement for an appeal under ETA s 37.
Judges:
McMullen QC J
Citations:
[2011] UKEAT 0659 – 10 – 1404
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440148