The appellant challenged the refusal of his appeal from a decision of the AIT refusing his claim for asylum. He said that he had good reason to fear his return home because his father had been a member of the Taleban.
Held: The immigration judge who considered the granting of leave to appeal should identify precisely the errors of law against which appeal was sought. That had not been done here allowing an appeal which was substantially on the facts alone.
Citations:
Times 27-Jun-2006
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Immigration
Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.242940