Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd v Price Waterhouse: ChD 7 Feb 1997

No duty of care was owed by accountants who were not auditors to lenders to the company audited. The claim was struck out.

Judges:

Laddie J

Citations:

Times 10-Feb-1997

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appealed toBank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Limited (In Liquidation); BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) SA (In Liquidation); Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (In Liquidation) v Price Waterhouse CA 13-Feb-1998
The special relationship between an auditor and a bank, meant that a duty of care could extend even to a second bank with its own auditors. In determining whether there had been an assumption of responsibility, the the relevant factors would include . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromBank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Limited (In Liquidation); BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) SA (In Liquidation); Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (In Liquidation) v Price Waterhouse CA 13-Feb-1998
The special relationship between an auditor and a bank, meant that a duty of care could extend even to a second bank with its own auditors. In determining whether there had been an assumption of responsibility, the the relevant factors would include . .
See AlsoBank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd (In Liqidation) and Others v Price Waterhouse and Others, Abu Dhabi Etc ChD 25-Jun-1997
A banker disclosing information about a customer’s business affairs save under lawful requirement, would commit a criminal offence. The head of a member of a Federation, the Ruler of Abu Dhabi, was not entitled to immunity while the President of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Professional Negligence

Updated: 05 May 2022; Ref: scu.78139