References: [1997] EWCA Civ 1784
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 18 March 2018
Ref: 142180
References: [1997] EWCA Civ 1784
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 18 March 2018
Ref: 142180
References: [1997] EWCA Civ 898
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 18 March 2018
Ref: 141294
References: [2015] ScotHC HCJAC_48
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 12 March 2018
Ref: 552280
Links: ScotC
Coram: Lord Carloway
Ratio:
Last Update: 03 March 2018
Ref: 168885
Links: ScotC
Coram: Lord Menzies
Ratio:
Last Update: 04 January 2018
Ref: 179477
References: [2013] UKICO FS50485626
Links: Bailii
Ratio: ICO The complainant requested details about the replacement of a Headteacher with an acting Deputy Head at a named school. Manchester City Council (the ‘Council’) responded stating that it did not hold the requested information. Following an internal review it provided some information and applied the exemption for personal information (section 40(2)) to the remainder. During the investigation the Council reverted to its original position that no information was held at the time the request was made. The Information Commissioner’s decision is that the information the Council identified at internal review was not held at the time of the request and has concluded, on the balance of probabilities, that the Council did not hold the requested information at the time of the request. He does not require the Council to take any steps.
Section of Act/EIR and Finding: FOI 1 – Complaint Not upheld
Last Update: 04 January 2018
Ref: 528486
References: [1915] AC 599
Coram: Lord Shaw of Dunfermline
Ratio: The right to use servient land for the purpose of storage was claimed. It was argued that such a right could not exist as an easement.
Held: Lord Shaw of Dunfermline said: ‘there is nothing in the purposes for which the easement is claimed inconsistent in principle with a right of easement as such.’
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 30 December 2017
Ref: 260030
References: [2002] UKIntelP o22402
Links: Bailii
Ratio: Refusal
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 26 November 2017
Ref: 455120
References: UKEAT/0771/03
Coram: His Honour Judge Birtles
Ratio: EAT Redundancy – Definition
Last Update: 14 November 2017
Ref: 198446
Links: ScotC
Coram: Lord Drummond Young
Ratio:
Last Update: 14 November 2017
Ref: 190798
References: [1974] 1 WLR 1460
Ratio:
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 27 September 2017
Ref: 190100
References: [2012] EWCA Crim 281
Links: Bailii
Coram: Hughes LJ, Simon, Lang JJ
Ratio: The defendant appealed against his conviction for murder, saying that he should have been allowed to rely on a plea of dimished responsibillity given the changes to section 2 of the 1957 Act introduced in 2009. He said that his alcoholism should have been treated as explaining his loss of self control and amounting to an abnormality of mind.
Statutes: Homicide Act 1957 82, Coroners and Justice Act 2009 52
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:
(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 26 September 2017
Ref: 451458
References: C-9/08, [2009] EUECJ C-9/08
Links: Bailii
Ratio: ECJ Action for annulment Decision of the European Parliament of 24 May 2007 on the verification of the credentials of Beniamino Donnici Member of the European Parliament – Verification of the credentials of a Member of the Parliament Appointment of a member resulting from the withdrawal of candidates Articles 6 and 12 of the 1976 Act.
Last Update: 28 March 2017
Ref: 342033
References: [2016] EWLVT LON_LV_VOL_00AY_0
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 05 September 2017
Ref: 563699
References: [2012] UKUT 38 (IAC)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 04 September 2017
Ref: 450980
References: [1910] 1 KB 173
Ratio: An occupier of land who knows that members of the public are in the habit of going on to his land and does nothing to prevent it, may be deemed to have licensed them to do so.
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:
(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 17 August 2017
Ref: 218728
References: [2016] ScotIC 113_2016
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Last Update: 08 August 2017
Ref: 566598
References: [2016] EWHC 779 (QB)
Links: Bailii
Coram: Coulson J
Ratio: Mrs Francis Cappuccini died whilst in the care of the second defendant (‘the Trust’). There can be no doubt that she should not have died and, in the absence of any clear explanation of what had happened, there were concerns that she may not have received proper anaesthetic care.
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 19 July 2017
Ref: 562792
References: [2013] EWHC 2672 (QB)
Coram: Simon J
Ratio: Where Article 4 applies, a party must bring forward evidence on foreign law and cannot simply rely on a presumption that in the absence of evidence foreign law should be assumed to be the same as English law.
Simon J said: ‘ It is not consonant with the overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Rules, in a case where the 1995 Act applies, for a party either to decline to plead the relevant provisions of the applicable law or to rely on a presumption that a foreign law is the same as English law. Such an approach is evasive. There may of course be an issue as to which particular law applies, but that is a different matter. The ‘parochial’ approach, which ‘presupposes that it is inherently just for the rules of the English domestic law of tort to be indiscriminately applied regardless of the foreign character of the circumstances and the parties’, is precisely the mischief which the Law Commission sought to remedy, and which was remedied by the 1995 Act’
Statutes: Rome II Regulation 4
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 13 July 2017
Ref: 566200
References: [1993] 14 Cr App R(S) 432
Ratio:
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 13 July 2017
Ref: 182319
References: [1992] 1 FLR 525 CA
Ratio:
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 08 July 2017
Ref: 182089
References: 64813/10, [2012] ECHR 1011
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights
Last Update: 08 July 2017
Ref: 460627
References: [1994] UKPC 26
Links: Bailii
Ratio: Belize
Last Update: 03 July 2017
Ref: 442383
References: [2011] UKUT B22 (TCC)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 03 July 2017
Ref: 448059
References: [2011] EWLVT CHI_LV_SVC_24UG_0
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 29 June 2017
Ref: 459401
References: [2011] EWLVT LON_LV_SVC_00AD_0
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 28 June 2017
Ref: 459357
References: [2011] UKIntelP o08511
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 26 June 2017
Ref: 458257
References: [2012] ScotIC 050_2012)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Last Update: 24 June 2017
Ref: 457788
References: [2002] UKIntelP o43802
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 24 June 2017
Ref: 455347
References: [2008] UKIntelP o11108
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 21 June 2017
Ref: 457004
References: [2003] UKIntelP o26403
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 17 June 2017
Ref: 455675
References: [2012] EWHC 745 (Ch)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 11 June 2017
Ref: 452446
References: [2001] UKIntelP o07001
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 10 June 2017
Ref: 454135
References: [2017] UKICO FS50611073
Links: Bailii
Ratio: ICO The complainant requested information relating to the Independent Commission on Freedom of Information (the Commission). The Cabinet Office denied holding information for one part of the complainant’s request. For the other requests, it refused to disclose the relevant information because it was third party personal data under section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act). During the Commissioner’s investigation, the Cabinet Office denied holding information for another part of the request, and for the others cited further exemptions: Section 35(1)(a) – for the information in its entirety; Section 35(1)(b) – for the specific correspondence which was communication between ministers; Section 36(2)(c) – should the Commissioner find that section 35 did not apply; Section 41(1) – for the correspondence concerning Jack Straw MP. The Commissioner’s decision is that on the balance of probabilities the Cabinet Office does not hold information relating to contact with the Labour and Liberal Democrat parties regarding the setting up of the Commission, or views or correspondence on the suitability of Jack Straw MP and Lord Carlisle. The Commissioner’s decision regarding section 35(1)(a) is that the exemption is engaged for the information in its entirety, and that the balance of the public interest test favours maintaining the exemption. The Cabinet Office breached section 17(1) by citing additional exemptions late. As the complainant has been informed of these new exemptions the Commissioner does not require the Cabinet Office to correspondence further on this. No steps are required.
FOI 1: Not upheld FOI 17: Upheld FOI 35: Not upheld
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Last Update: 10 June 2017
Ref: 583832
References: [2011] ScotIC 229_2011)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 10 June 2017
Ref: 451543
References: [2012] EWHC B2 (Fam)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 460518
References: [2012] EWHC 408 (Fam)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 460521
References: [2012] EWHC 983 (Fam)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 460529
References: [2012] EWHC 1670 (Comm)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 460510
References: [2012] EWHC 265 (Fam)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 460515
References: [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 460517
References: C-370/11, [2012] EUECJ C-370/11
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 459569
References: [2012] EWHC 554 (Admin)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 459546
References: [2011] ScotIC 214_2011)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 451538
References: [2012] ScotIC 007_2012)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 451519
References: [2011] ScotIC 215_2011)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 451537
References: [2012] ScotIC 025_2012)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 451528
References: [2012] ScotIC 020_2012)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 451530
References: [2012] ScotIC 036_2012)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 451531
References: [2012] ScotIC 029_2012)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 451520
References: [2012] UKFTT 2011_0206 (GRC)
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 452346
References: [2012] EWCA Crim 319
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 31 May 2017
Ref: 452373
References: [1971] 1 All ER 1077, (1971) 55 Cr App R 223 (PC), [1971] AC 814
Coram: Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest
Ratio: It is a defence in criminal law to a charge of assault if the defendant had an honest belief that he was going to be attacked and reacted with proportionate force: ‘If there has been an attack so that defence is reasonably necessary, it should be recognised that a person defending himself cannot weigh to a nicety the exact measure of necessary defensive action. If a jury is of the opinion that in a moment of unexpected anguish the person attacked did only what he honestly and reasonably thought was necessary, that should be regarded as most potent evidence that only reasonably defensive action was taken.’
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 30 May 2017
Ref: 190054
References: T-522/10, [2012] EUECJ T-522/10
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 25 May 2017
Ref: 451171
References: [2010] ScotIC 174_2010
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 09 May 2017
Ref: 433903
References: [2010] NIIT 02858_10IT
Links: Bailii
Ratio:
Last Update: 09 May 2017
Ref: 433069
References: C-97/04, [2004] EUECJ C-97/04
Links: Bailii
Coram: K. Lenaerts, P
Ratio: Environment And Consumers – Failure to fulfill obligations – Directive 2000/76/EC – Incineration of waste – Failure
Statutes: Directive 2000/76/EC
Last Update: 01 May 2017
Ref: 220002
References: [1978] 1 WLR 165
Coram: Lord Fraser, Viscount Dilhorne, Lord Keith of Kinkel
Ratio: The principles set out in Canada Steamship apply to ‘clauses which purport to exempt one party to a contract from liability’. The principles should be applied without ‘mechanistic construction’. Lord Keith of Kinkel: The tests were guidelines, but ‘guidelines’ but ‘the matter is essentially one of the ascertaining the intention of the contracting parties from the language they have used, considered in the light of surrounding circumstances which must be taken to have been within their knowledge.’
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:
(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 22 April 2017
Ref: 185979
We live or die, sadly, by the visitor statistics. We hit a peak in early May, and then fall off a cliff. I have been saying (bravely), that all will be well, and that the corner will be turned on the second Monday in July.
Here we are two days later, and lo and behold, the 30 day running total of Page Views did indeed turn on Monday and improve again on Tuesday. I am not sure how pleasing it is that the figures are so predictable, but in cycle terms, they are.
More pleasing is that we are still doing much better than last year. On the second Monday of July 2015, the page views over the previous 30 days stood at 137471. This year, that figure was 201576. This represents about a 45% increase over the year.
References: [2016] EWFC B28
Links: Bailii
Coram: Troy HHJ
Ratio Application for care order.
Last Update: 07-May-16
Ref: 563140